A Comparative Analysis of the Views of Chinese and Western Philosophers on the Philosophy of Experience
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2026-2-49-55
Abstract
Aim. To analyze and compare the views of Chinese and Western philosophers on the nature of experience and metaphor in language.
Methodology. The comparative method was used, and the works of G. Lakoff, M. Johnson and ancient Chinese philosophers were studied.
Results. It is revealed that the ideas of experiential philosophy resonate with classical Chinese thought.
Research implications. The study highlights the relevance of integrating Western cognitive linguistics and Chinese philosophy for further research in language and cognition.
About the Author
Yang Wu
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yang Wu – Postgraduate Student, Department of Philosophy
Moscow
References
1. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. 245 p.
2. 王洪印. 公孙龙子白话解. 西安: 三秦出版社, 1997. 94 p.
3. 卢遵达、王宁. 训诂与训诂学. 太原: 山西教育出版社, 1994. 113 p.
4. 戴浩一.汉语功能语法的认知研究 // 页.外国语言学. 1991年第1页.
5. Pütz M., Dirven R. The Construal of Space in Language and Thought. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1996. 704 p.
6. Lyons J. Semantics. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. 897 p.
7. Johnson, M., Lakoff, G．Why Cognitive Linguistics Requires Embodied Realism // Cognitive Linguistics. 2002. № 13 (3). P. 245–263.
8. 张明刚. 隐喻通论. 北京: 北京出版社, 1985.147 p.
9. 许国璋. 语言符号任意性问题 // 外语教学与研究. 1988. 39 p.
Review
Views:
49
JATS XML
Email this article 