Preview

Contemporary Philosophical Research

Advanced search

The Role of Mass Media in Modern Military and Political Conflicts

https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2025-4-131-139

Abstract

Aim. To define role of mass media in shaping public opinion and influencing the course and outcome of modern military-political conflicts, considering historical examples, digital transformations and philosophical approaches.

MethodologyContent analysis, historical and comparative analysis, philosophical reflection (in O. Spengler’s, M. Castells’, and V. Pelevin’s style), and case method that includes the analysis of media coverage of conflicts (Yugoslavia, Iraq, Vietnam, Chechnya, Ukraine) were used as the key methods.

ResultsThe transformation of the media from a communication channel into a subject of political and military power is proved. The direct relationship between the results of military campaigns and the success of their information support is shown. Parallels have been established between historical examples of manipulation of public opinion (Gliwicki provocation, Vietnam, Iraq) and digital conflicts of the 21st century. The new role of the mass media as an institution of political mobilization and pressure beyond the scope of state jurisdiction is demonstrated.

Research implications. The role of the media as an independent political actor in modern conflicts is substantiated, digital propaganda mechanisms, that can be used in the system of media literacy, countering fakes and extremism, as well as in the strategic planning of information policy, is identified.

About the Author

I. S. Trigubenko
Federal State University of Education
Россия

Igor S. Trigubenko – Independent Researcher

Moscow



References

1. Spengler, O. (2023). The Decline of the West. Moscow: Eksmo publ. (in Russ).

2. Castells, M. (2000). The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Moscow: Higher School of Economics publ. (in Russ.).

3. Kornilova, O. V. (2024). Operation Konserve, the Incident in Gleiwitz and the Bromberg Bloody Sunday: from the History of the Nazi Strategy “Denial and deception” at the Outbreak of the World War II in Europe (August – September 1939). In: Science. Society. Defense, 12 (2), 11. DOI: 10.24412/2311-1763-2024-2-11-11 (in Russ).

4. Nye, J. S. (2006). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Moscow: Trend publ. (in Russ.).

5. Pocheptsov, G. G. (2000). Psychological Wars. Moscow: Refl-book publ., Vakler publ. (in Russ.).

6. Dugin, A. G. Pop Culture and Signs of the Times. Moscow: Amphora publ. (in Russ.).

7. Heywood, E. (2005). Politics. Moscow: Unity-Dana publ. (in Russ.).

8. Hammond, P. (1964). Framing Post-Cold War Conflicts: The Media and International Intervention. New York: Manchester University Press publ.

9. Zygar, M. (2021). All Are Free: The Story of How Propaganda Saved Russia in 1996. Moscow: Alpina publ. (in Russ.).

10. Limonov, E. V. (2002). Disciplinary Sanatorium. St. Petersburg: Amphora publ. (in Russ.).


Review

Views: 89

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5121 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5148 (Online)