Quasi-Humanistic Ideas and Surveillance Capitalism as Social Reality
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2025-4-98-107
Abstract
Aim. To analyze quasi-humanistic ideas of pseudo-, anti-, trans-, post-, and neohumanism in the context of the contemporary reality of surveillance capitalism.
Methodology. The study employs classification, critical analysis, and generalization.
Results. It was demonstrated that surveillance capitalism, in its early stages, developed in a pseudo-humanistic manner while harboring hidden power ambitions to collect as much behavioral data from users as possible. The study revealed that treating users as a source of a new type of resource (behavioral surplus) is a sign of emerging post-humanism.
Research implication. It is proposed to use neo-humanism on the basis of the Christian tradition, which determines the practical significance of the study for philosophers, theologians, and economists studying the structure of modern digital society.
About the Authors
N. V. Korotkov
Kirov State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay V. Korotkov – Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Assoc. Prof., Department of Humanities and Social Science
Kirov
A. I. Musin
Moscow State University of Technology “STANKIN”; Vyatka State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Artem I. Musin – Deacon, Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Assoc. Prof., Department of Physics, ; Assoc. Prof., Department of Physics and Teaching Physics
Moscow
References
1. Bondareva, Ya. V. & Zhavoronkova, G. A. (2025). Formation of a New Social Reality (Humanism vs. Artificial Intelligence). In: Contemporary Philosophical Research, 1, 33–39. DOI: 10.18384/2949-5148-2025-1-33-39 (in Russ.).
2. Schaeffer, J.-M. (2010). The End of Human Exceptionalism. Moscow: New Literary Review publ. (in Russ.).
3. Singer, P. (2021). Animal Liberation. Moscow: Sindbad publ. (in Russ.).
4. Castro, E. V. de. (2017). Cannibal Metaphysics: For a Post-Structural Anthropology. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press (in Russ.).
5. Agamben, J. (2021). Extreme Poverty. Monastic Rules and Form of Life. Moscow, St. Petersburg: Gaidar Institute publ., Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences, St. Petersburg State University publ. (in Russ.).
6. Cox, H. (1995). The Secular City: Secularization and Urbanization in Theological Perspective. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura publ. (in Russ.).
7. Robertson, D. (2020). How to Think Like a Roman Emperor: The Stoic Philosophy of Marcus Aurelius. Moscow: Eksmo publ., BOMBORA publ. (in Russ.).
8. Marcus Aurelius. (1993). Reflections. St. Petersburg: Nauka publ. (in Russ.).
9. Foucault, M. (1996). The Will to Truth. Moscow: Kastal publ. (in Russ.).
10. Yarovaya, E. V. (2025). The Influence of Transhumanism on Society. Prospects and Consequences. In: Contemporary Philosophical Research, 1, 101–107. DOI: 10.18384/2949-5148-2025-1-101-10 (in Russ.).
11. Harman, G. (2024). Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press publ. (in Russ.).
12. Loskutov, Yu. V. (2021). “Flat Ontology” in a Social Context. In: New Ideas in Philosophy, 8 (29), 89–98 (in Russ.).
13. Kriman, A. I. (2024). Latour’s Actor-Network Theory in the Context of the Departure from Anthropocentrism in Posthumanism. In: Social Sciences and Humanities. Domestic and Foreign Literature. Series 3: Philosophy, 4, 152–161. DOI: 10.31249/rphil/2024.04.16 (in Russ.).
14. Nesteruk, A. V. (2025). God, the Universe, and Man: Philosophical Crossroads of Christian Theology, Modern Cosmology, and Astrobiology. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI “Rehabilitation” (in Russ.).
15. Zuboff, S. (2024). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Moscow: Gaidar Institute publ. (in Russ.).
16. Gumbrecht, H. U. (2006). Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Moscow: New Literary Review publ. (in Russ.).
Review
Views:
2
Email this article 