Intelligence Within the Context of Mind and Consciousness: Dialectics of the First and the Third Person
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2025-4-6-17
Abstract
Aim. A targeted analysis of the essence of intelligence in the context of its relation to such central mental phenomena as mind and consciousness.
Methodology. The key methods were the dialectical ones that helped to reflect the complex nature of human mental reality. Dialectics reveals the inconsistency and dynamism of the interpenetration of objective and subjective sides in the intelligence, emphasizes its discrepancy with consciousness in their close coexistence.
Results. Intelligence cannot be reduced to a neutral third-person phenomenon. It turns out to be an integral formation of a living psyche that unites thinking and other processes aimed at setting goals, overcoming problems, making decisions, and learning new.
Research implications. The research reveals complex interaction between intelligence and consciousness in the field of psychology. It asserts a substantial primacy of the first person in intelligence, its foundation in the activity of the self.
About the Author
A. I. ZhelninRussian Federation
Anton I. Zhelnin – Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Assoc. Professor, Department of Philosophy
Perm
References
1. Descartes, R. (1994). Works. Vol. 2. Moscow: Mysl publ. (in Russ.).
2. Chalmers, D. (2019). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Moscow: URSS publ. (in Russ.).
3. Malabou, C. (2019). Morphing Intelligence: From IQ Measurement to Artificial Brains. New York: Columbia University Press.
4. Pfeifer, R. & Scheier, C. (2001). Understanding Intelligence. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5. Piaget, J. (2004). Psychology of Intelligence. St. Petersburg: Piter publ. (in Russ.).
6. Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books publ.
7. Dubrovsky, D. I. (2002). The Problem of the Ideal. Subjective Reality. Moscow: Kanon+ publ. (in Russ.).
8. Dennett, D. (2004). Kinds of Minds Toward an Understanding of Consciousness. Moscow: Idea-Press publ. (in Russ.).
9. Brushlinsky, A. V. (2003). Subject Psychology. St. Petersburg: Aletheia publ. (in Russ.).
10. Damasio, A. (2024). The Strange Order of Things: Life, Feeling, and the Making of Cultures. Moscow: AST CORPUS publ. (in Russ.).
11. Gasparyan, D. E. (2021). The First-Person Perspective Description Error in Naturalism. In: Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 37 (3), 403–415. DOI: 10.21638/spbu17.2021.303.
12. Searle, J. (2002). Rediscovering Consciousness. Moscow: Idea-Press publ.
13. Smirnov, A. V. (2023). Meaning and Variability of Reason. In: Philosophical Journal, 16 (2), 5–17. DOI: 10.21146/2072-0726-2023-16-2-5-17.
14. Girenok, F. I. (2023). Why Isn’t Consciousness Intelligence? In: Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7. Philosophy, 47 (2), 19–32. DOI: 10.55959/MSU0201-7385-7-2023-2-19-32 (in Russ.).
15. Zhelnin, A. I. (2024). Objective Embodiment of Logic: From Computing Machines to Life and Intelligence? In: Philosophical Thought, 2, 34–48. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2024.2.69896 (in Russ.).
16. Frege, G. (2020). Logic and Logical Semantics. Moscow: LIBROKOM publ. (in Russ.).
17. Mikhailov, I. F. (2015). Man, Consciousness, Networks. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences publ. (in Russ.).
18. Kaufman, S. B. (2011). Intelligence and the Cognitive Unconscious. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press publ., pp. 442–467.
19. Nagl, L. (2022). Digital Technologies: Reflections on the Difference between Instrumental Rationality and Practical Reason. In: Kantian Journal, 41 (1), 60–88. DOI: 10.5922/0207-6918-2022-1-3 (in Russ.).
20. Gasparyan, D. E. (2020). Phenomenology without a Transcendental Subject: Neurophenomenology and Enactivism in Search of a First-Person Perspective. In: Philosophical Journal, 13 (1), 80–96. DOI: 10.21146/2072-0726-2020-13-1-80-96 (in Russ.).






















