The most important principle of Russian Religious Philosophical anthropology was synergy that can be treated as a cooperation of man's freedom and God's grace. It is a combination of objective conditions (God's gift) and subjective conditions (created by man). The content of this principle was often opened through such categories and principles as "Catholicity”, "Androgynous”, "Creation”, "Symbolical realism” and "All-Unity”.

The present article deals with the examination of an interdisciplinary approach to the study of time. The explication of the maintenance of the given approach is carried out and an attempt is made to analyse its ontological foundation. The proposed conclusion is that the given approach faces a number of serious difficulties caused by the ambivalent maintenance of the concept "reality” in philosophy and science.

The urgency of the problem raised in the article is caused by the necessity of forming servicemen's life quality system under the conditions of the Russian Federation Armed Forces modification. The authors consider the theoretical and methodological fundamentals of forming servicemen's life quality system, the structure of the social military environment and analyze the perspective of applying cognitive-value approach to the study of servicemen's life quality.

This article examines the ideology of social code based on the concept, its development, transformation and transmutation in one of three basic models -the new European. The basic characteristics of ideology are considered. The concept «ideopractice», necessary to analyze the principles of social survival and activity of individuals following the collapse of the totalitarian ideology, is considered as a transformation of the social code, compared with the doctrine of "ideoverzia”. The adopted methodology is applied to the analysis of Guy Debord's social activity. It was he who transformed social code in terms of private ideology and everyday life convergence.

The article analyzes the views of the well-known futurists А. Toffler and Z. Brzezinski on the development of personality, social groups, institutions, public authorities and society in general, as well as potential threats, challenges to be faced by humanity in the near future. The article summarized that futurological views of Toffler and Brzezinski cannot be unambiguously interpreted as pessimistic or optimistic. However, these views are based on careful analysis of the situation in contemporary society, which allows futurologists to substantiate the basic trends of its further development.

The article investigates the interaction mechanisms of internalization of values and the formation of social structures, institutions; identifies the relationship between the structuring of values and the stability of institutional rules, patterns of behavior; determines the feasibility of personal potential for the formation and development of new social institutions; analyzes the necessary properties of the value system of the subject involved in the design of social relationships; studies the nature and direction of social change in modern Russian society.

The article deals with socialization and forms of socialization. One effective way of social impact on the individual is art. In the pre-reform period sociological understanding of socialization through art was dominant. The author develops a new understanding of the social role of art arising from the specific features of art and its effects: it socializes individuals through its spirituality, harmony, beauty, showing struggle between good and evil in the world and the results of this struggle understood by different artists in different ways.

The relevance of the philosophical understanding of anthropological problems is confirmed by constant interest and absolute value of the study of the core issues of philosophy and biblical anthropology, not only in historical-philosophical context, but also as a search for ways of harmonizing the achievements of ancient philosophical heritage and the experience of Christian faith in the context of the total exploration of the world and man. The article analyzes the basic philosophical aspects of studying spiritually-flesh composition of man, human soul and its faculties on the basis of the works of the Cappadocian school.

The study of the views on the nature and purpose of man is a current one, as no anthropological concept occurs in isolation from general philosophical historical context. The Cappadocian Fathers philosophically expressed the foundations of the Christian doctrine of faith, including basic anthropological categories. Based on the analysis of the works of Cappadocian philosophers the article considers the main philosophical aspects of the study of anthropological problems of corruptible and incorruptible in man, the damaged synergy of human and possibility of its recovery.

The article deals with the analysis of social and philosophical interpretation of the custom «potlatch» as an alternative economic model which is presented in the works of the French philosopher Guy Debord. Debord's concept is studied in the context of Marcel Mauss' anthropological research and socio-philosophical ideas of Georges Bataille which are considered here as immediate roots of the concept. The author also studies the phenomena in modern Internet culture that correlate with «potlatch» (the principle of file sharing technology «torrent»).

The article describes the essential features of a cognition system in which certain types of consciousness and knowledge are seen as forms of a single, organically evolving spiritual culture. The authors focus on the analysis of the historical development of this system, in which some forms of cognition of the existence come to the fore and act as dominants, while others go to the periphery and are affected by the first. The study concludes that the current state of cognition-system is characterized by a lack of distinct dominants, vague boundaries between different forms of cognizing the existence. These processes are particularly acute in the cultural context of contemporary Russia, which is caused primarily by the rethinking of previous sociocultural ideals and orientations.