Structural properties of cultural space
Abstract
The author, apply principles of nonequilibrium development of complex
systems, opens internal and external culture structure. The culture represents
the system of universals on the one hand, and mobile imbalance on the other hand,
defined by senses and designations.
According to the author, the analyse of cultural universals structure will allow,
to open determination processes of culture. A culture appears as correlation of idea
and object is in consciousness. In In consciousness the field of culture appears as formation
of sense of life. Cultural universals as such is based on a comprehension by a
man itself and the surrounding world and translation of this comprehension in abstraction,
in steady character, allotted, as a rule, by separate different lines and having
different possibilities for development. The subject side of life, certain cultural
universals, can be presented as plugging in itself four basic varieties of object: things
(instruments), symbols, signs and maximum signs. Otherwise speaking framework
of culture there are universals. To cultural universals take a language, joint activity,
things and objects, signs and maximum signs. The distinctive side of modern cultural
situation become the displacement of levels of cultural structure. The repeated
symbolizing of material side goes out on the first plan. Things are already not only
things (instruments), and find the supersemantic setting. Calling again to the marked
problem, we can distinguish, that most researchers are named the increasing role of
subject side of life as one of basic signs of modern culture. As a culture for a man is
the determinative field of life, so consideration of management methods of culture is
most actual. The author offers management concept of cultural processes through the
system of cultural space hard structuring. The reflection of consciousness can become
basis of such structuring. Effective management by the frames of society is, foremost
correct ranging of structure through facilities of culture. Management of the cultural
processes must avoid an artificial stretch or compression of cultural field. Permanent
reflection and clear structuring will allow to avoid situation of displacement of cultural
universals. Processes, flowing in a culture take appropriate character. There are
processes which reflect forming of new culture forms, other processes expose correlation
of internal and external in a culture system. But there are processes which result
in destruction of culture. There are dissipative processes. Conscious reflection and
structuring of the cultural field will allow to avoid the origin of these processes.
systems, opens internal and external culture structure. The culture represents
the system of universals on the one hand, and mobile imbalance on the other hand,
defined by senses and designations.
According to the author, the analyse of cultural universals structure will allow,
to open determination processes of culture. A culture appears as correlation of idea
and object is in consciousness. In In consciousness the field of culture appears as formation
of sense of life. Cultural universals as such is based on a comprehension by a
man itself and the surrounding world and translation of this comprehension in abstraction,
in steady character, allotted, as a rule, by separate different lines and having
different possibilities for development. The subject side of life, certain cultural
universals, can be presented as plugging in itself four basic varieties of object: things
(instruments), symbols, signs and maximum signs. Otherwise speaking framework
of culture there are universals. To cultural universals take a language, joint activity,
things and objects, signs and maximum signs. The distinctive side of modern cultural
situation become the displacement of levels of cultural structure. The repeated
symbolizing of material side goes out on the first plan. Things are already not only
things (instruments), and find the supersemantic setting. Calling again to the marked
problem, we can distinguish, that most researchers are named the increasing role of
subject side of life as one of basic signs of modern culture. As a culture for a man is
the determinative field of life, so consideration of management methods of culture is
most actual. The author offers management concept of cultural processes through the
system of cultural space hard structuring. The reflection of consciousness can become
basis of such structuring. Effective management by the frames of society is, foremost
correct ranging of structure through facilities of culture. Management of the cultural
processes must avoid an artificial stretch or compression of cultural field. Permanent
reflection and clear structuring will allow to avoid situation of displacement of cultural
universals. Processes, flowing in a culture take appropriate character. There are
processes which reflect forming of new culture forms, other processes expose correlation
of internal and external in a culture system. But there are processes which result
in destruction of culture. There are dissipative processes. Conscious reflection and
structuring of the cultural field will allow to avoid the origin of these processes.
About the Author
Ирина Недугова
Южно-Уральский государственный университет
(филиал в г. Миасс, Челябинская обл.)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Ахиезер А.С. Культура, модальность, интерпретация//Категории и понятия марксистско-ленинской теории культуры. - М., 1985. - 765 с.
2. Фуко М. Слова и вещи. Археология гуманитарных наук. Пер. с фр. В.П. Визгина и Н.С. Автономовой. - СП б.: А-сad, 1994. - 408 с.
3. Модернизация в России и конфликт ценностей. - М., 1993. - 329 с.
4. Маркузе Г. Одномерный человек / Г. Маркузе. - М.: REFL -book, 1994. - 324 с.
5. Парсонс Т. Социальное действие / Т. Парсонс. - М., 2000. - 310 с.
Review
Views:
54
Email this article 