ESSENTIAL AND OCCASIONAL IN HISTORY
Abstract
The article is aimed at revealing the methodological essence of the categories “necessity” and “occasionality” and applying them to historical analysis. The peculiarities of the genesis of necessity and occasionality are described and their role is shown in historical perspective. The author discloses the difference between these two phenomena, their dialectic unity, interconnection and interpenetration. The opportunities of techniques formed on the basis of these phenomena are considered in the process of historical cognition.
References
1. Бочаров А.В. Историографические и методологические аспекты использования понятия «случайность» в изучении исторических альтернатив // Вестник Томского государственного университета. - 2007. - № 297. - С. 111-121.
2. Кокорин А.А. Анализ: теория, методология, методика. - Изд. 2-е (перераб. и дополн.). - М.: Изд-во МГОУ, 2009. -292 с.
3. Яценко М.П. Глобализация как форма организации исторического процесса [Электронный ресурс]. - URL: http://www.dibase.ru (дата обращения: 10.03.2014).
4. McCloske D. History differential equations and narrative problems // History & Theory. - 1991. - № 1. - P. 21-36.
5. Schermer M. Exorcising Laplace’s Demon: Chaos And Antichaos, History And Metahistory // History and Theory. - 1995. - № 1. - P. 59-83.
Review
Views:
87
Email this article 