LABOR, RATIONALITY, GAMES
https://doi.org/ 10.18384/2310-7227-2017-1-15-27
Abstract
The article suggests a possible option of proving the thesis of dependence of assessment of actions as rational or irrational on teleologically engaged semantic-axiological net in the framework of which they are carried out by means of interpretation of the problem of labor and rationality in logic, game theory and activity theory. The possibility of objective verification/falsification of the elements of subjective rationality is shown and the wording of the problem of metagame and the metarationality as an alternative interpretation of the problems of transformation of rationality into irrationality is proposed.
References
1. Леонтьев А.Н. Деятельность, сознание, личность. М.: Смысл, 2004. 353 с.
2. Ролз Дж. Теория справедливости. Новосибирск: Новосибирский государственный университет, 1995. 535 с.
3. Смит А. Исследование о природе и причинах богатства народов. М.: Соцэкгиз, 1962. 688 с.
4. Эльстер Ю. Объяснение социального поведения: ещё раз об основах социальных наук. М.: Высшая школа экономики, 2011. 472 с.
5. Adorno T. The Stars Down to Earth and Other Essays on the Irrational in Culture 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2001. 256 p.
6. Axelrod R. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 2006. 264 p.
7. Baker G. The Harmony of Interests Revisited [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://politics.as.nyu.edu/docs/IO/4756/baker_chap1.pdf (дата обращения: 22.06.2015).
8. Braverman H. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1998. 465 p.
9. Buchanan J.M., Tullock G. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://files.libertyfund.org/files/1063/Buchanan_0102-03_EBk_v6.0.pdf (дата обращения: 11.05.2015).
10. Hofstadter D. Metamagical themas: questing for the essence of mind and pattern. New York: Basic Books, 1985. 852 p.
11. Kitcher P. The evolution of human altruism // Journal of Philosophy. 1993. No. 60 (10). Pp. 497-516.
12. Komorita S., Sheposh J., Braver S. Power, the use of power, and cooperative choice I a two-person game // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1968. Vol. 8. Pp. 134-142.
13. Kraines D., Kraines V. Pavlov and the Prisoner’s Dilemma // Theory and Decision. 1989. No. 26 (1). Pp. 47-79.
14. Poundstone W. Prisoner’s Dilemma: John von Neumann, Game Theory, and the Puzzle of the Bomb. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. 290 p.
Review
Views:
160
Email this article 