Cyberculture as a 21st Century Phenomenon
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2026-2-102-113
Abstract
Aim. To analyze the essence of culture that is an integral and crucial part of human existence for people of all races, nationalities, faiths, and places of permanent residence.
Methodology. The primary methods are systemic and dialectical, which made it possible to examine culture as a holistic sociohistorical organism consisting of many elements existing in a contradictory unity.
Results. Culture is a universal phenomenon of global society, developing in any human community. However, culture also always has its own specific characteristics, determined by the mental characteristics of the people who create it.
Research implications lie in revealing the cultures of different societies within a societal system, which can also be considered a unique spiritual phenomenon of human civilization.
About the Authors
A. V. Tonkonogov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandr V. Tonkonogov – Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof.
Moscow
M. G. Akhmedov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Muslimat G. Akhmedova – Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Department of Social Philosophy
Moscow
References
1. Tonkonogov, A. V. (2015). Russians as a Political Super-Ethnos. In: Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 1, 31–49 (in Russ.).
2. Shakirov, A. I. & Simkacheva, M. V. (2023). Ontological Foundations of Cyberculture in the Digital Society. In: Philosophy and Culture, 4, 227–238 (in Russ.).
3. Martyanova, E. G. & Chesnova, E. N. (2025), Cyberculture and Virtual Ethnicity as Phenomena of Digital Society: Problems and Prospects. In: Gumanitarnyye Vedomosti TGPU im. L. N. Tolstogo, 4 (56), 128–146 (in Russ.).
4. Tonkonogov, A. V. (2023). On the State Scientific and Educational Portal of the Runet. In: Law and Legislation, 2, 109–112 (in Russ.).
5. Kypson, A. P. & Chitwood, Jr. W. R. (2004). Robotic Applications in Cardiac Surgery. In: International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 1 (2), 87–92.
6. Melfi, F. M., Menconi, G. F., Mariani, A. M. & Angeletti, C. A. (2002). Early Experience with Robotic Technology for Thoracoscopic Surgery. In: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 21 (5), 864–868. DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00102-1.
7. Tay, Y. W. D., Panda, B., Paul, S. C., Noor Mohamed, N. A., Tan, M. J. & Leong, K. F. (2017). 3D Printing Trends in Building and Construction Industry: A Review. In: Virtual and Physical Prototyping, 12 (3), 261–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2017.1326724.
8. Wiener, N. (1968). Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Moscow: Sovetskoye radio publ.
9. Stelmakh, A. P. & Tonkonogov, A. V. (2012). Ensuring Cybernetic Security of the Russian Federation (Fundamentals of General Cyberology). Moscow: Russian State Agrarian University: Moscow Agricultural Academy publ. (in Russ.).
10. Tonkonogov, A. V. (2026). Cyberlaw and Cyberlegislation: Jurisprudence of a Cybernetic Society. In: Law and Legislation, 1, 97–100 (in Russ.).
11. Tonkonogov, A. V. (2025). CyberCulture: A Scientific Essay. Moscow (in Russ.).
Review
Views:
68
JATS XML
Email this article 