The Logic of Great Challenges and Priorities for National Development
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2026-1-104-113
Abstract
Aim. To examine the priorities of national goal setting within the paradigm of great challenges.
Methodology. The primary methods used were traditional analysis of scientific facts collected by representatives of various social and humanitarian disciplines, source research, comparative analysis of philosophical strategies, logical analysis techniques, and methods of scientific abstraction and generalization.
Results. The review of fundamental concepts and principles conducted in this work is essential for the development of a philosophical theory of society. Civilizational identity becomes the primary focus of great challenges, the preservation of which is a necessary condition for survival and civilizational development, contrary to traditional notions in the context of global crises and social upheavals, external expansions, and natural disasters.
Research implications. The recognition of the advent of a new historical stage in the development of social and philosophical thought, its analysis, and generalization have significant theoretical significance in modern times and also complement the picture of the interaction between technology and society in the context of the transition to a new technological order.
About the Author
I. Przhilenskiy
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor Przhilenskiy, Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Assoc. Prof.
Department of Humanities
Moscow
References
1. Lapin, N. I. (2017). The Great Challenges of the New Russia and the Development of Innovative Systems in Its Regions. In: Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, 3 (3), 8–18. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2017-3-3-8-18 (in Russ.).
2. Lapin, N. I. (20021). Man, and the Interaction Culture with Society in the Past, Present, and Future of Russia (Continuing the Traditions of the Axial Generation). In: Voprosy Filosofii, 5, 5–16. DOI: 10.21146/0042-8744-2021-5-5-16 (in Russ.).
3. Mainzer, K. (2009). Thinking in Complexity: The Complex Dynamics of Matter, Mind and Mankind. Moscow: LIBROKOM publ. (in Russ.).
4. Prigogine, I. R. & Stengers, I. (1986). Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Moscow: Progress publ. (in Russ.).
5. Gaidar, E. T. (2009). Power and Property: Times of Troubles and Institutions. State and Evolution. St. Petersburg: Norma publ. (in Russ.).
6. Panarin, A. S. (1994). Russia in the Civilization Process (Between Atlanticism and Eurasianism). Moscow: IFRAS publ. (in Russ.).
7. Rubtsov, A. V. (2021). Models of Civilizational Development in the Contexts of Universal Discourse. Project Composition, Thematic Structure, Framework of Categories. In: Civilization Studies Review, 3 (1), 128–172. DOI: 10.21146/2713-1483-2021-3-1-128-172 (in Russ.).
8. Dynkin, A. A. (2019). Social and Humanitarian Dimension of Responses to Great Challenges. In: Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 89 (4), 384–389. DOI: 10.31857/S0869-5873894384-389 (in Russ.).
9. Przhilensky, I. V. (2025). National Strategic Planning: Cultural Transformations and Great Challenges. In: Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University, 15 (2), 30–39. DOI: 10.26794/2226-7867-2025-15-2-30-39 (in Russ.).
10. Rozhdestvenskaya, S. M. & Klochkov, V. V. (2017). The Paradigm of “Great Challenges” in the System of Strategic Planning of Scientific and Technological Development. In: Russia: Development Trends and Prospects. Iss. 2. Pt. 3. Moscow: INION RAS publ., pp. 389–394 (in Russ.).
11. Ivanov, V. V. & Malinetsky, G. G. (2020). Great Challenges of the 21st Century. In: Innovations, 2 (256), 3–13. DOI: 10.26310/2071-3010.2020.256.2.001 (in Russ.).
Review
Views:
94
JATS XML
Email this article 