Preview

Contemporary Philosophical Research

Advanced search

Philosophical Foundations of Overcoming the Universalistic Approach in Russian Humanities

https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2026-1-13-25

Abstract

   Aim. To reveal the value of the ideas presented by Russian philosophers on understanding the specificity of the Russian civilizational tradition and overcoming the universalist approach in the Russian education system.

   Methodology. The study was conducted using a local-civilizational approach, historical, comparative and hermeneutic methods, as well as figurative and logical modeling.

   Results. The results obtained can serve as a basis for both understanding difficulties of the key differences in the Russian tradition and a need to form an authentic theoretical and methodological toolkit, as well as a conceptual basis, for its further development in public consciousness and educational programs, despite the country’s reorientation from the model of a nation-state to the model of a state-civilization. As an alternative to the key values of Western civilization, such as individualism, human rights and freedoms, and market competition (which have become the foundation of liberal theory and capitalism), the concept of conciliarity, the idea of service, and the principle of cooperative efforts have been proposed.

   Research implications. The issues raised in the article are of significant importance for Russia’s policy on state identity and the subsequent transformation of the educational process and the revision of curricula in the entire range of social-humanitarian disciplines.

About the Authors

Ya. V. Bondareva
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation

Yana V. Bondareva, Dr . Sci . (Philosophy), Prof ., Head of the Department

Department of Philosophy

Moscow



S. G. Ilinskaya
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Svetlana G. Ilinskaya, Dr. Sci. (Political Sciences), Chief Specialist

Office of Network and Partner Projects of Public Policy

Moscow



References

1. Toynbee, A. (2021). A Study of History. Moscow: Academicheskiy Proekt publ. (in Russ.).

2. Khomyakov, A. S. (1994). Works. Vol. 1. Works on Historical Philosophy. Moscow: Medium publ. (in Russ.).

3. Bondareva, Ya. V. & Ilyinskaya, S. G. (2024). The Logic of Russian Civilization Idea through the Prism of Russian Philosophy. In: Contemporary Philosophical Research, 2, 64–75. DOI: 10.18384/2949-5148-2024-1-64-75 (in Russ.).

4. Bondareva, Ya. V. & Ilyinskaya, S. G. (2024). Philosophical Foundations of the Russian Tolerance Model. In: Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 4, 27–39. DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2024.4.3 (in Russ.).

5. Erakhtin, A. V. (2014). Ontology and Transcendental Metaphysics of Immanuel Kant. In: Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 4, 111–114 (in Russ.).

6. Danilevsky, N. Ya. (2018). Russia and Europe. Moscow: Algorithm publ. (in Russ.).

7. Spengler, O. (2019). The Decline of the West. Minsk: Popurri publ. (in Russ.).

8. Zenkovsky, V. V. (2011). History of Russian Philosophy. Moscow: Academicheskiy Proekt publ. (in Russ.).

9. Varava, V. V. (2025). All that Dear and Scorching. Lectures on the History of Russian Philosophy. St. Petersburg: Russian Academy of Arts; Sun of the North publ. (in Russ.).

10. Reznik, Yu. M. (2023). Toward I. Kant’s Metaphysics. The Concept of “Phenomena” and Its Significance for Understanding the Civilizational Existence of Man (Part 2). In: Personality. Culture. Society, 25 (3–4), 82–92. DOI: 10.30936/1606_951X_2023_25_3_4_82_92 (in Russ.).

11. Bulgakov, S. N. (1993). The Tragedy of Philosophy. In: Bulgakov, S. N. Works. Vol. 1. Moscow: Nauka publ., pp. 309–518 (in Russ.).

12. Trubetskoy, N. S. (2022). Europe and Humanity. Moscow: Opustoshitel publ. (in Russ.).

13. Shevchenko, V. N., Spiridonova, V. I. & Sokolova, R. I. (2018). “New Modernity” and Tradition in a Multipolar World: A Philosophical and Political Analysis. Moscow: Institute of Philosophy of the RAS (in Russ.).

14. Kireevsky, I. V. (2015). On the Necessity and Possibility of New Beginnings for Philosophy. St. Petersburg: Abbess Taisia Memory Society publ. (in Russ.).

15. Trubetskoy, N. S. (1925). The Legacy of Genghis Khan. A View of Russian History Not from the West, but from the East. Berlin: Eurasian Book publ. (in Russ.).

16. Baranov, S. D. (2024). Civilization of Eastern Europe (Axis Civilization). Moscow: Heritage Institute publ. (in Russ.).

17. Lvov, D. S. (2007). Russia: Boundaries of Reality and Contours of the Future. In: Journal of Economic Theory, 1, 5–17. (in Russ.).

18. Metropolitan John (Snychev) (2004). Russian Symphony. Essays on Russian Historiosophy. St. Petersburg: Tsarskoe Delo publ. (in Russ.).

19. Fursov, A. I. (2019). Forward to the Victory! Russian Success in Retrospect and Prospect. Moscow: Knizhny Mir publ. (in Russ.).

20. Ilyinskaya, S. G. (2020). Authentic Development: Key Aspects of the Concept. In: RUDN Journal of Political Science, 22 (1), 116–133. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1438-2020-22-1-116-133.


Review

Views: 115

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5121 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5148 (Online)