Actual Problems of the Correlation of Physicality and Sociality of a Person in Modern Society
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2024-3-96-105
Abstract
Aim. To study the relationship between human corporality and sociality in modern society, to identify problem areas of the corporal-social relationship in the 21st century, and to search for ways to overcome contradictions.
Methodology. The methodological basis of the article is formed by the methods of comparative analysis and comparative-historical approaches.
Results. It is shown that in the modern world a multi-level contradiction arises between human corporality and society, which is caused by the incompatible scale of socio-technical evolution with biological evolution, which is virtually invisible against the background of technical progress, resulting in the process of destruction of man as a corporal-social being. It is revealed that destructive manifestations are largely due to the underestimation by society of the corporal factor of human existence, and this, in turn, threatens the existence of society and man.
Research implications. The study identified the reasons that give rise to the most significant contradictions between corporality and sociality in the modern world. It is shown that the most important task of the positive development of modern man and society is the harmonization of interactions between corporeality and sociality at all levels by producing social attitudes in which the corporeal and the social will be equivalent, complementary components for each specific person and society.
About the Authors
N. S. Zhidkova
Russian State Social University; 4 bld. 1
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia S. Zhidkova– Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Assoc. Prof., Head of the Center for the Development of Educational Programs,
4 bld. 1, Wilhelma Picka str., Moscow 129226.
M. A. Zhidkov
Russian State Social University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhail A. Zhidkov – Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Assoc. Prof., Assoc. Prof., Department of Anti-Corruption Activities and Public Counteraction,
4 bld. 1, Wilhelma Picka str., Moscow 129226.
References
1. Alekseev A. Yu. [Multi-agent Categories of Robophilosophy: Robo-ness and Robo-zombies]. In: Iskusstvennye obshchestva [Artificial Societies], 2020, vol. 15, no. 2. Available at: https://artsoc.jes.su/s207751800009761-6-1 (accessed: 04.06.2024). DOI: 10.18254/S207751800009761-6
2. Asmolov A. G., Asmolov G. A. [From We-media to I-media: Transformations of Identity in the Virtual World]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psihologiya [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14: Psychology], 2010, no. 1, pp. 3–21.
3. Baryshnikov P. N., Atakuev M. N. [Social Functions of Interoception and the Global Market of Body Data]. In: Filosofskie problemy informacionnyh tekhnologij i kiberprostranstva [Philosophical Problems of Information Technology and Cyberspace], 2021, no. 1, pp. 83–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17726/philIT.2021.1.5
4. Bekarev A. M., Pak G. S. [Threats to Body Identity in Prefigurative Culture]. In: Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sociologiya [Bulletin of Perm University. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2024, no. 1, pp. 64–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2024-1-64-73
5. Byhovskaya I. M. “Homo Somatikos”: aksiologiya chelovecheskogo tela [“Homo Somatikos”: Axiology of the Human body]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 2000. 208 p.
6. Byhovskaya I. M., Goryainova O. I. [Socialization and Inculturation of the Individual: A Comparative Analysis of Socially Significant Practices]. In: Kul’tura kul’tury [Culture of Culture], 2021, no. 1. Available at: http://cult-cult.ru/socialization-and-inculturation-of-the-individual-a-comparative-analysis-of-soci (accessed: 04.06.2024).
7. Gorlova I. I. Banizhe O. O. [Corporality, Bodily Practices and Body Code in the Aspect of Problematization]. In: Pravo i praktika [Law and Practice], 2015, no. 7, pp. 117–123.
8. Goryainova O. I. [Dialectics of Socialization: Myth and Cultural Scenario]. In: Vlast’ [Power], 2013, no. 1, pp. 72–75.
9. Kuznecova E. V. [The Relationship between the Image of the “Bodily Self” and the Socialization of Adolescents]. In: Voprosy pedagogiki [Issues of Pedagogics], 2021, no. 7, pp. 157–162.
10. Lebedev N. S. [Epistemological Foundations for the Development of Personal Thinking: from Bodily and Social Awareness to Moral Issues]. In: Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sociologiya [Bulletin of Perm University. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology], 2023, no. 2, pp. 207–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2023-2-207-218
11. Markov B. V. [Bodily Memory and Digital Communication]. In: Filosofiya hozyajstva [Philosophy of the Economy], 2022, no. 1, pp. 149–160.
12. Morozova O. O. [Human Corporeality: A Combination of the Social and the Existential]. In: Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, Philosophical, Political and Legal Sciences, Cultural Studies and Art Criticism. Theoretical and Practical Issues], 2016, no. 6, pt. 1, pp. 131–135.
13. Petrunin Yu. Yu. [Artificial Intelligence: The Path to the Future?]. In: Filosofskie nauki [Philosophical Sciences], 2018, no. 4, pp. 96–113. DOI: 10.30727/0235-1188-2018-4-96-113
14. Puchkov O. A. [Anthropological Approach in Genetic and Legal Studies]. In: Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika [Law and Order: History, Theory, Practice], 2022, no. 4 (35), pp. 20–26.
15. Fromm E. The Sane Society (Rus. ed.: Banketova T. V., Karpushina S. V., transls. Zdorovoe obshchestvo. In: Psihoanaliz i kul’tura: izbrannye trudy Karen Horni i Eriha Fromma [Psychoanalysis and Culture: Selected Works of Karen Horney and Erich Fromm]. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 1995, pp. 275–565).
16. Fromm E. Man for Himself (Rus. ed.: Dudinskaya D. N., transl. Chelovek dlya sebya. In: Begstvo ot svobody. Chelovek dlya sebya [Escape from Freedom. Man for Himself]. Moscow, Popurri Publ., 2000, pp. 367–667).
17. Foucault M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Rus. ed.: Shkuratov V. A., transl. Nadzirat’ i nakazyvat’. Rozhdenie tyur’my. In: Kul’turologiya [Culturology]. Rostov on Don, Feniks Publ., 2001, pp. 520–540).
18. Chapny E. V. [The Influence of Neuroscience on the Understanding of the Bodily Determinacy of Cognitive Processes: Socio-Anthropological Aspect]. In: Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya [Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Philosophy], 2023, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 940–956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2023-27-4-940-956
19. Scheler M. Man in the Era of Equalization (Rus. ed.: Denezhkin A. V., Malinkin A. N., Fillipova A. F. Chelovek v epohu uravnivaniya. Scheler M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Moscow, Gnozizd Publ., 1994, pp. 98–128.
Review
Views:
64
Email this article 