Historiography of the Philosophy of Bengali Vishnuism in Colonial India
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2024-3-30-42
Abstract
Aim. Identification and classification of various positions and their ideological foundations in the historiography of the philosophy of Bengali Vishnuism or Gaudiya Vedanta in the colonial period.
Methodology. The analysis of the researchers’ views, their identity and strategies for interpreting the history, philosophy and lifestyle of the Bengali Vaishnavism is carried out. The main problems of Gaudiya Vedanta philosophy, which are the subject of divergence between different groups of researchers, are also highlighted.
Results. A classification of four groups of researchers has been obtained: 1) Gaudiya Vaishnavas, 2) Protestant missionaries, 3) literature researchers, 4) neo-vedantists. The main problems are the methodology of research, the divinity of the Chaitanya, the continuity and morality of the tradition, irrationalism and the consistency of Gaudiya Vedanta philosophy. The mutual influence of Gaudian philosophy and Russian philosophy was discovered through correspondence of Leo Tolstoy.
Research implications. The theoretical significance lies in explaining the current position of Gaudiya Vedanta in the academic environment of India and allows a more objective approach to the material under study.
About the Author
D. N. PopovRussian Federation
Dmitry N. Popov – Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Senior Lecturer, Department of Humanities; Researcher, Research Department,
49/2, Leningradsky Prospekt ave., Moscow 125167;
Mayapur Chandrodaya Mandir, Mayapur 741313, West Bengal, (India).
References
1. Burmistrov S. L. [Absolute and history in the historical and philosophical concepts of S. Dasgupta and G. Hegel]. In: Evrazijstvo i mir [Eurasianism and the World], 2013, no. 1, pp. 91–101.
2. Burmistrov S. L. [Indian historians of philosophy in the twentieth century: choosing a position]. In: Pis’mennye pamyatniki Vostoka [Written monuments of the East], 2012, no. 1 (16), pp. 138–150.
3. Burmistrov S. L. [Driving forces of the historical and philosophical process in the philosophy of neo-Vedantism]. In: Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy], 2008, no. 12, pp. 153–162.
4. Vatman S. V. Bengal’skij vajshnavizm [Bengal Vaishnavism]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University Publ., 2005. 405 p.
5. Vatman S. S. [The Vishnuite treatise “Bhakti-rasamrita-sindhu”, its structure, content and doctrinal role]. In: Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A. S. Pushkina [Bulletin of the Leningrad State University named after A. S. Pushkin], 2019, no. 3, pp. 212–225.
6. Pskhu R. V., Kryshtop L. E. [The history of Indian philosophy in medieval India and the beginning of the reception of Indian philosophy in the European intellectual space]. In: Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy], 2017, no. 5, pp. 148–160.
7. Radhakrishnan S. Indian philosophy (Rus. ed.: Kal’yanov V. I., ed. Indijskaya filosofiya. Moscow, Mif Publ., 1993. 732 p.).
8. Fil Yu. S. [Bhaktivinoda Thakur in Light of Modern Rational Criticism of Traditional Beliefs]. In: Gaudeamus Igitur, 2020, no. 1, pp. 22–28.
9. Carney G. T. Baba Premananda Bharati: his trajectory into and through Bengal Vaiṣṇavism to the West. In: The Legacy of Vaiṣṇavism in Colonial Bengal. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020, pp. 135–160.
10. De S. K. The Vaishnava faith and movement in Bengal from Sanskrit and Bengal sources. Calcutta, 1942. 556 p.
11. Wong L. Gauḍīya Vaiṣṇavism and Modernity. In: The Journal of Hindu Studies, 2020, no. 13 (1), pp. 1–9.
12. Kennedy M. T. Caitanya Movement: Study of Vaishnavism of Bengal. London, Oxford University Press, 1925. 290 p.
13. Nicol M. Indian Theism. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 1915. 292 p.
14. Malik G. N. Philosophy of Vaishnava Religion (with special reference to the Kṛṣṇaite, and Gouraugite Cults). Vol. 1. Lahore: Punjab Sanskrit Book Depot, 1927. 486 p.
15. Wong L., Sardella F. The Legacy of Vaishnavism in Colonial Bengal. Routledge, 2019. 280 p.