I. A. Ilyin’s Modern Ecology as an Ideological Basis for the Development of the Philosophy of Ecology, Ecological Philosophy and Philosophy of Nature
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2023-3-62-67
Abstract
Aim. To show the difference between such ecologized directions of philosophical thought as the philosophy of ecology, ecological philosophy, and philosophy of nature.
Methodology. To study this issue, general and specific scientific methods are used including deduction and induction, analysis, synthesis, generalization, philosophical and historical analysis.
Results. The differentiation and conceptualization of the concepts of philosophy of ecology, ecological philosophy and philosophy of nature is carried out, and the specifics of the current stage of ecology development are analyzed.
Research implications. The results of the research prove that modern ecology closely interacts with the sphere of philosophical knowledge, which results in the identification of separate areas – philosophy of ecology, ecological philosophy, philosophy of nature.
About the Author
E. V. Rochnyak
Gorlovka University for Foreign Languages
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena V. Rochnyak – Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Assoc. Prof., Philosophy and History Department
ul. Rudakova 25, Gorlovka 284626, Donetsk People’s Republic
References
1. Deryabo S. D., Yasvin V. A. [Two Models of Ecology]. In: Chelovek [Human], 1998, no. 1, pp. 34–40.
2. Doronina M. V. [Peculiarities of Forming the Subject of Philosophy of Ecology]. In: Manuskript [Manuscript], 2016, no. 8 (70), pp. 64–67.
3. Duvigneaud P., Tanghe M. Ecosystemes et biosphere (Rus. ed.: Rafes P. M., transl. Biosfera i mesto v nej cheloveka. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1973. 270 p.).
4. Kiselev N. N., Krysachenko V. S., Gardashuk T. V. Metodologiya ekologicheskogo sinteza [Methodology of Environmental Synthesis]. Kiev, Naukova dumka Publ., 1996. 220 p.
5. Liseev I. K. [Co-evolutionary Strategy in Modern Scientific Knowledge]. In: Filosofiya i metodologiya nauki [Philosophy and Methodology of Science]. Minsk, Belorusskaya nauka Publ., 2014, pp. 485–490.
6. Nesprava M. V. [Philosophy of Ecology and Ecological Philosophy: Differentiation and Conceptualization]. In: Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science, 2020, no. 43–3, pp. 52–59.
7. Opolev P. V. [Enactivism as an Epistemology Science of Complexity]. In: Omskij nauchnyj vestnik. Seriya: Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost’ [Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity], 2023, no. 8 (1), pp. 118–126.
8. Suvorova G. M. [Ecology of Education: Philosophical Perspective of the Coevolutionary Concept]. In: Noosfernye issledovaniya [Noospheric Research], 2022, no. 3, pp. 20–26.
9. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. New York, Oxford University Press, 2005. 1077 p.
10. Keller D. R., Golley F. B., eds. The Philosophy of Ecology: From Science to Synthesis. Georgia, University of Georgia Press, 2000. 392 p.
Review
Views:
65
Email this article 