The Role of Theology in the Revival of the True Vocation of the Scholar

Aim. At present there is a tendency to profanation of some spheres of activity formerly considered sacred. Unfortunately, science has become one of them. It should also be stated that the vocation of a scientist, previously perceived as a special existential gift, a mission, is losing its original high meaning. In the presented work the reasons of disappearance of Spirit of science, its demystification are considered, one of which, in our opinion, is the loss of connection with the living tradition, which can be restored by theology as a science, which is a carrier of direct tradition and, therefore, called to become a bridge, connecting sacred and profane, breathing Spirit in modern scientific thought, offering the system of coordinates honed by centuries, based on the highest principles of morality and ethics, promoting revival of the real vocation of a scientist.
Methodology. Based on an analysis of the literature, as well as on our own experience of scholarly activity and leadership in scholarly research, the author attempts to reconsider the ideas of idealist philosophers, traditionalists, theologians and theologians from different centuries and religious traditions concerning the specific mission of scientists and the true goals of science, by demonstrating the meaning of evangelic parables and Islamic Hadiths.
Results. Studying the past through the prism of the present enables us to realize the possibility and necessity of introducing the field of values and meaning from the religious to the academic field, thanks to the intermediary role of theology as a science which helps revive the real vocation of science and gives back to science its sacred meanings.
Research implications. In article five problems which, in opinion of the author, are the cause of loss by scientists of a rank “Salt of the Earth” and “Heirs of prophets” are revealed; possibilities of theology, its spiritual and moral potential and world outlook basis in the decision of each of the specified problems are presented, and also the conditions the observance of which will allow theology to make the contribution to the restoration of original senses are considered. We believe that it is possible to extrapolate the proposed approach to other scientific fields as a special component of the general system of education of a young researcher.

1. Al-Ghazālī A. H. Kimiya-yi Sa’ādat (Rus. ed.: Hismatulin A. A., transl. “Kimiĭa-ĭi sa‘adat” (“Eliksir schast’ya”). Moscow, Ihlas Publ., 2011. 464 p.).

2. Althusser L. Widerspruch und Überdetermination (Rus. ed.: Denezhkin A. V., transl. Protivorechie i sverhdeterminaciya (Zametki k issledovaniyu). In: Althusser L. Za Marksa [Pour Marx]. Moscow, Praksis Publ., 2006, pp. 127–186).

3. Antonovsky A. Yu., Barash R. E. [On Max Weber’s Science: Reception and Modernity]. In: Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and Philosophy of Science], 2018, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 174–188.

4. Birzhenyuk G. M., Efimova T. V. [Hirsch Index as a Simulacrum, or Equation of Known with Unknown]. In: Vestnik kul’tury i iskusstv [Bulletin of Culture and Arts], 2018, no. 1 (53), pp. 22–32.

5. Bratus B. S. [The Problem of Returning the Category “Souls” to Scientific Psychology]. In: Nacional’nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal [National Psychological Journal], 2014, no. 3 (15), pp. 3–12.

6. Vanhoozer K. J. Is There a Meaning in This Text? The Bible, The Reader, and the Morality of Literary Knowledge (Rus. ed.: Chetirko V., transl. Iskusstvo ponimaniya teksta. Literaturovedcheskaya etika i tolkovanie Pisaniya. Cherkassy, Kollokvium Publ., 2007. 736 p.).

7. Weber M. Wissenschaft als Beruf (Rus. ed.: Davydov Yu. N., transl. Nauka kak prizvanie i professiya. In: Weber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990, pp. 707–735).

8. Guénon R. La crise du monde moderne (Rus. ed.: Melent’eva N., ed. Krizis sovremennogo mira. In: Krizis sovremennogo mira [Crisis of the Modern World]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2008, pp. 5–140).

9. Grant R. The Hermeneutical Spiral: A Comprehensive Introduction to Biblical Interpretation (Rus. ed.: Serikova N., transl. Germenevticheskaya spiral’. Obshchee vvedenie v biblejskoe tolkovanie. Odessa, Evro-Aziatskaya Akkreditacionnaya Associaciya Publ., 2009. 728 p.).

10. Dyomin I. V. [The Principle of “Ontological Differentiation” in the Phenomenology of M. Heidegger and in the Metaphysics of Integral Traditionalism R. Guenon]. In: Filosofskaya mysl’ [Philosophical Thought], 2015, no. 7. Available at: https://nbpublish.com/e_fr (accessed: 14.07.2022).

11. Egerev S. V. [Scientific Creativity and Social Stereotypes]. In: Naukovedcheskie issledovaniya [Naukovedcheskie Issledovaniya], 2016, no. 1, pp. 129–154.

12. Kasavin I. T. [Dilemma of the Scientist: After Max Weber]. In: Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy], 2019, no. 7, pp. 18‒22.

13. Kasavina N. A. [The Mission of a Scientist in the “Disenchanted” World]. In: Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy], 2019, no. 7, pp. 28–32.

14. Coomaraswamy A. K. Christian and Oriental Philosophy of Art (Rus. ed.: Makovich M. V., transl. Vostok i Zapad. Religiya, mifologiya, simvolika, iskusstvo. Moscow, Belovod’e Publ., 2018. 184 p.).

15. Lyubimova T. B. [“Eternal Philosophy” of a Single Tradition in Symbols]. In: Vox: filosofskij zhurnal [Vox: Philosophical Journal], 2018, no. 24. Available at: https://vox-journal.org (accessed: 14.07.2022).

16. Mamardashvili M. K. Besedy o myshlenii [Conversations about Thinking]. Moscow, Fond Meraba Mamardashvili Publ., 2015. 816 p.

17. Maslanov E. V. [Civil Science – Science as a Vocation]. In: Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and Philosophy of Science], 2019, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 40–44.

18. Nikiforov A. L. [Transformation of Science in the 20th century: From the Search for Truth to the Improvement of Technology]. In: Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and Philosophy of Science], 2019, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 20–29.

19. Nikiforov A. L. [Philosophy as a Personal Experience]. In: Kasavin I. T., ed. Zabluzhdayushchijsya razum? Mnogoobrazie vnenauchnogo znaniya [Deluded Mind? Variety of Extra-Scientific Knowledge]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1990, pp. 296–327.

20. Ogorodnikov A. Yu. [Pragmatic and Axiological Foundations of the Activity of a Scientist in the World Scientific Space]. In: Medicina. Sociologiya. Filosofiya. Prikladnye issledovaniya [Medicine. Sociology. Philosophy. Applied Research], 2021, no. 4, pp. 100–106.

21. Pylaev M. A. Kategoriya “Svyashchennogo” v fenomenologii religii, teologii i filosofii XX veka [The Category of “Holy” in the Phenomenology of Religion, Theology and Philosophy of the 20th century]. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities Publ., 2017. 215 p.

22. Stolyarova O. E. [The Vocation of a Scientist in a Disenchanted and Re-Enchanted World]. In: Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Politologiya [Bulletin of Tomsk State University Philosophy. Sociology. Political Science], 2020, no. 55, pp. 255–260.

23. Tillich P. Systematic Theology (Rus. ed.: Lifintseva T. P., Gazizova O. R., Osherova V M., Rynkevich V. V., transls. Sistematicheskaya teologiya. T. I–II. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Universitetskaya kniga Publ., 2000. 463 p.).

24. Timofeev I. V. Biruni [Biruni]. Moscow, Molodaya gvardiya Publ., 1986. 304 p.

25. Trubnikov N. N. [Science and Morality (On the Spiritual Crisis of European Culture)]. In: Kasavin I. T., ed. Zabluzhdayushchijsya razum? Mnogoobrazie vnenauchnogo znaniya [A Delusional Mind? Variety of Extra-Scientific Knowledge]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1990, pp. 278–295.

26. Tuhvatulina L. A. [On an Imaginary Contradiction in Scientific Rationality]. In: Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki [Epistemology and Philosophy of Science], 2019, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 51–55.

27. Fedotova O. D., Semenov G. V. [The Purpose of the Scientist in the Assessment of Philosophers – Rectors of the University of Berlin]. In: Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul’tura [Society: Philosophy, History, Culture], 2018, no. 1, pp. 10–14.

28. Fichte J. G. Einige Vorlesungen über die Bestimmung des Gelehrten (Rus. ed.: Volzhsky V., transl. Neskol’ko lekciĭ o naznachenii uchyonogo. In: Fichte J. G. Sochineniya [Essays. Vol. 2]. St. Petersburg, Mifril Publ., 1993, pp. 7–64).

29. Heidegger M. Über den Humanismus (Rus. ed.: Bibihin V., transl. Pis’mo o gumanizme. In: Bibihin V., transl. Vladimir Bibihin. Available at: http://bibikhin.ru/pismo_o_gumanizme (accessed: 14.07.2022)).

30. Shmonin D. V. [Scientific Rationality and “Return to Theology”]. In: Voprosy teologii [Questions of Theology], 2019, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 280–306.

31. Evola G. Rivolta contro il mondo moderno (Rus. ed.: Zelencov D., transl. Vosstanie protiv sovremennogo mira. Moscow, Prometej Publ., 2016. 476 p.).

32. Evola G. The Hermetic Tradition (Rus. ed.: Butozov G., transl. Germeticheskaya tradiciya. Voronezh, Terra Foliata Publ., 2015. 272 p.).

33. Evola G. La dottrina del risveglio (Rus. ed.: Shurbelev A. P., transl. Uchenie o probuzhdenii. Ocherki buddijskoj askezy. St. Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’ Publ., 2016. 416 p.).