Russian Statehood as a Problem Field of Eurasian Philosophy
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7227-2023-1-30-36
Abstract
Aim. To analyze the main ascetics of the historiosophical doctrine of the Russian statehood nature within the framework of classical Eurasianism philosophy. Representatives of this philosophical trend managed to create an original doctrine of the state, based on the civilizational and cultural approach to the development of Russia which keeps relevant up till now.
Methodology. The article considers that view on the state, which has become a real alternative to the traditional Eurocentric methodology. In the course of the study, cultural, comparative-historical, dialectic and comparative methods were used.
Results. The article concludes that the Eurasianists deeply studied the issues of the existence of the state of Russia-Eurasia, as a result of which the idea arose of a great civilizational power of Russia, capable of resisting the Western world, including the matters of state building. The significance of the Eurasians’ civilizational and cultural approach to the interpretation of the specifics of the Russian state development was determined, the connection between the cultural identity of the Eurasian world and the original state emerging on its soil, as well as the prospects of these ideas for further designing state building in our country, was identified.
Research implications. The study allows us to get an idea of the specifics of Russian statehood, based on the special inter-civilizational nature of the Eurasian world.
About the Author
I. V. KopylovRussian Federation
Ilya V. Kopylov – Postgraduate Student, Department of Philosophy, Social Sciences and Social Security Law
ul. Captaina Egorova 15, Murmansk 183038
References
1. Alekseev N. N. [Soviet Federalism]. In: Evrazijskij vremennik [Eurasian Time Book], 1927, pt. 5, pp. 240–261.
2. Bazavluk S. V. [Eurasianism: Terminological Ambivalence]. In: Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: International relations], 2018, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 273–283.
3. Bajdikov K. G. [Spiritual Sovereignty as a Value of Russian statehood]. In: Social’no-gumanitarnye znani- ya [Social and Humanitarian Knowledge], 2021, no. 4, pp. 97–104.
4. Vinogradov A. I., Kopylov I. V. [The Essence of the Doctrine of the Eurasians about the State]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofskie nauki [Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Philosophical Sciences], 2020, no. 1, pp. 48–54.
5. Karabaeva K. D. [The Concept of the Eurasian State in the Context of the Philosophical Tradition of the Russian Abroad]. In: Rossijskij zhurnal pravovyh issledovanij [Russian Journal of Legal Research], 2019, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 65–72.
6. Karsavin L. P. [The Phenomenology of the Revolution] In: Evrazijskij vremennik. Kn. 5 [Eurasian Times. B. 5]. Paris, Evrazijskoe knigoizdatel’stvo Publ., 1927, pp. 28–74.
7. Lyuks L. [Eurasianism]. In: Evrazijstvo i mir [Eurasianism and the World], 2018, no. 1, pp. 3–15.
8. Panarin I. N. [Fundamentals of the Theory of “Hybrid War”]. In: Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo evra- zijskih gosudarstv: politika, ekonomika, pravo [International Cooperation of Eurasian States: Politics, Economics, Law], 2019, no. 4, pp. 58–71.
9. Savicky P. N. [Europe and Eurasia (On the Pamphlet of Prince N. S. Trubetskoy “Europe and Humanity”)]. In: Russkaya mysl’ [Russian Thought], 1921, no. 1–2, pp. 119–138.
10. Sizemskaya I. N. [Eurasianism: Historiosophical Insights and Warnings]. In: Problemy civilizacionnogo razvitiya [Problems of Civilizational Development], 2020, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 68–84.
11. Suvchinsky P. P. [To Overcome the Revolution]. In: Evrazijskij vremennik. Kn. III [Eurasian Times. B. III]. Berlin, Evrazijskoe knigoizdatel’stvo Publ., 1923, pp. 30–51.
12. Shahmatov M. A. [The State of Truth (An Experience in the History of State Ideals in Russia)]. In: Evrazijskij vremennik. Kn. 3 [Eurasian Times. B. 3]. Berlin, Evrazijskoe knigoizdatel’stvo Publ., 1923, pp. 268–304.