ARCHETYPAL SACREDNESS OF THE TEMPORALITY OF HUMAN EXISTENCE: PHILOSOPHICAL AND ANTHROPOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Aim. To conduct a philosophical and anthropological analysis of the problem of a person’s sacred attitude to his own temporality as to the Other in the context of considering its ambivalent essence using the example of various concepts that affect this area of research and, accordingly, allow expanding dynamically developing ideas about a person.
Methodology. This study was carried out using the method of analytical anthropology, which is taken as a basis and made it possible to show the implicit influence of a person’s attitude to time as an Other on the economic area of his life. The use of the historical and philosophical approach made it possible to analyze the most significant elements of various conceptual systems of thought from the perspective of ideas about temporality as the Other and their relation to the economy. The use of the method of comparative analysis made it possible to compare different authors of both the continental and domestic philosophical traditions in their cross-relation to each other through a single problem of temporality as the Other. The use of the dialectical method made it possible to level the logic of the binary opposition and to consider in the complex dynamics of man and temporality as an inseparable economic area of the Other. The method of interpretation made it possible to reveal the relevance of various philosophical concepts in terms of reflecting the ongoing processes of modernity.
Results. The analysis showed that the ambivalence of a person’s experience of his own temporality has undergone significant changes and represents the archetypal nature of self-preservation, capable of both ensuring the integrity of the development of the human spirit and leading it to total self-destruction, thereby causing both a harmonious and disharmonious relationship with the animated the being of the world and with oneself.
Research implications. The rationale for this study lies in the development of a conceptual consideration within the framework of philosophical anthropology of the phenomenon of temporality as the Other, which, in turn, made it possible to identify new horizons and ways of understanding the relevant problem with the prospect of expanding the interdisciplinary diversity of areas of philosophical knowledge and appropriate tools for further analysis of this topic.

1. Baudrillard J. Pour une critique de lеconomie politique du signe (Rus. ed.: D. Yu. Kralechkin, transl. K kritike politicheskoj ekonomii znaka. Moscow, RIPOL-klassik, 2020. 352 p.).

2. Bulgakov S. N. Filosofiya imeni [Philosophy of the Name]. Moscow, KaIr Publ., 1997. 330 p.

3. Bulgakov S. N. Filosofiya hozyajstva [Philosophy of Economy]. Moscow, TERRA Publ., Knizhnyj klub Publ., 2008. 352 p.

4. Hegel G. W. F. System Der Wissenschaft. Erter Theil. Die Phaenomenologie des Giestes (Rus. ed.: Shpet G., transl. Sistema nauk. Chast’ pervaya. Fenomenologiya duha. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2015. 443 p.).

5. Hegel G. W. F. System Der Wissenschaft. Wissenschaft der Natur (Rus. ed.: Sitkovsky E. P., ed. Enciklopediya filosofskih nauk. T. 2: Filosofiya prirody. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1975. 695 p.).

6. Husserl E. G. A. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie (Rus. ed.: Mihailov A. V., transl. Idei k chistoj fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoj filosofii. Kn. 1: Obshchee vvedenie v chistuyu fenomenologiyu. Moscow, Akademicheskij proekt Publ., 2019. 489 p.).

7. Deleuze G., Guattari P.-F. Kafka. Pour une litterature mineure (Rus. ed. Svirsky Ya. I., transl. Kafka: za maluyu literaturu. Moscow, Institut obshchegumanitarnyh issledovanij Publ., 2015. 112 p.).

8. Deleuze G., Guattari P.-F. Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? (Rus. ed.: Zenkin S. N., transl. Chto takoe filosofiya? St. Petersburg, Aletejya Publ., 2018. 288 p.).

9. Kojéve A. Introduction á la lecture de Hegel (Rus. ed.: Keno R., comp., Pogonyajlo A. G., transl. Vvedenie v chtenie Gegelya: Lekcii po fenomenologii duha, chitavshiesya s 1933 po 1939 g. v Vysshej prakticheskoj shkole. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2013. 791 p.).

10. Lacan J.-M.-É. Le seminaire. Le transfert. Livre viii (1960/61) (Rus. ed.: Chernoglazov A., transl. Perenos (Seminary: Kniga VIII (1960/61). Moscow, Gnozis Publ., Logos Publ., 2019. 432 p.).

11. Lacan J.-M.-É. Le seminaire le moi dans la nheorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse. Livre 2 (Rus. ed.: Titova M., Chernoglazov A., transls. “Ya” v teorii Frejda i v tekhnike psihoanaliza (Seminar, Kniga I (1953/54)). Moscow, Gnozis Publ., Logos Publ., 2019. 432 p.).

12. Lyotard J.-F. Economie libidinale (Rus. ed.: Lapicky V. E., transl. Libidinal’naya ekonomika. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Gajdar’s Institute Publ., Fakultet svobodnyh iskusstv i nauk SPbGU Publ., 2018. 472 p.).

13. Lyotard J.-F. La condition postmoderne (Rus. ed.: Shmatko N. A. Sostoyanie postmoderna. St. Petersburg, Aletejya Publ., 2016. 160 p.).

14. Ricœur P. Le conflit des interpretations (Rus. ed.: Vdovina I. S., transl. Konflikt interpretacij. Ocherki o germenevtike. Moscow, Akademicheskij Proekt Publ., 2008. 695 p.).

15. Sartre J.-P. C. A. L’Être et le néant: Essai d’ontologie phénoménologique (Rus. ed.: Kolyadko V. I., transl. Bytie i nichto. Opyt fenomenologicheskoj ontologii. Moscow, AST MOSKVA Publ., 2009. 925 p.).

16. Foucault P.-M. Histoire de la sexualité, vol. 4: Les aveux de la chair (Rus. ed.: Gashkov S., transl. Istoriya seksual’nosti 4. Priznaniya ploti. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press Publ., Muzej sovremennogo iskusstva “Garazh” Publ., 2021. 416 p.).

17. Heidegger M. Der Begriff Der Zeit (Rus. ed.: Shurbelev A., ed. Ponyatie vremeni. St. Peterburg, Vladimir Dal Publ., 2021. 199 p.).