UNDERSTANDING – A TECHNOLOGY OF CONSUMER PROJECTS (CP). (TECHNOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION AND SCHEMATIZATION)
https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7227-2022-2-6-14
Abstract
Aim. Content expansion of the theoretical foundations in a series of articles devoted to the philosophical and methodological understanding of consumer projects and their technological support.
Methodology. Understanding is considered in the context of connections with meanings and situations, which is reflected in schematization, which ideologically complements the communication technology.
Results. The main result of this research is the transition from a purely conceptual analysis of understanding to its functional features in activity. This makes it possible to actualize sociotechnical ontology. Thereby the growing tradition of presenting understanding as an exclusively structural element of the cognitive process has been overcome. The author analyzes the process of understanding in the context of communication and comes to the conclusion that the above-mentioned process is carried out in three variations (ontological, subject-descriptive and subjective).
Research implications. The results of the research are the creation of tools for organizing the communication exchange in the universal sense of the word. Historically, the processes of reflection, understanding and communication have been recorded in the description of the organizational and activity games (OAG), but this does not mean that such practices cannot be transferred to other professional fields. This study continues a series of articles devoted to consumer projects and their epistemological significance in the context of categorical understanding of business processes.
About the Author
R. O. IsaevRussian Federation
Roman O. Isaev – Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Assoc. Prof., Department of Philosophy and Social and Humanitarian Sciences
ul. Molodogvardeyskaya 244, Samara, 443100
References
1. Heisenberg W. Physik und Philosophie. Der Teil und das Ganze (Rus. ed.: Ahutina A. V., transl. Fizika i filosofiya. Chast’ i celoe. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989. 400 p.).
2. Zinoviev A. Faktor ponimaniya [Factor of Understanding]. Moscow, Algoritm Publ., 2019. 528 p.
3. Isaev R. O. Avtoritet v kontekste sovremennoj filosofii: smysl, ponimanie, znanie [Authority in the Context of Modern Philosophy: Meaning, Understanding, Knowledge]. Cheboksary, Sreda Publ., 2020. 180 p.
4. Isaev R. O. [Communication – Technology of Consumer Projects (CP). (Technological Description and Schematization)]. In: Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya [Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: Philosophy], 2021, no. 3 (57), pp. 55–67.
5. La Mettrie J. Traité de l’âme (Rus. ed.: Grossman E. A., Levitsky V., transls. Traktat o dushe (Estestvennaya istoriya dushi). Sochineniya. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1983. 511 p.).
6. Mamardashvili M. Psihologicheskaya topologiya puti. T. 2 [Psychological Topology of the Path]. Moscow, Fond Meraba Mamardashvili Publ., 2020. 1248 p.
7. Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit (Rus. ed.: Bibihin V. V., transl. Bytie i vremya. Harkov, Folio Publ., 2003. 503 p.).
8. Schleiermacher F. Ueber die Religion. Reden an die Gebildeten unter ihren Verächtern. Monologen (Rus. ed.: Frank S. L., transl. Rechi o religii k obrazovannym lyudyam, eyo prezirayushchim. Monologi. Moscow, Iks-Histori Publ., 2015. 475 p.).
9. Shchedrovicky G. P. [Analysis of the Situation in the Gaming Movement. Report at the All-Union Conference “Prospects for the Development of System-Thought-Activity Methodology and Game movement” in Kyiv. January 6, 1989]. In: Shchedrovicky G. P. Organizacionno-deyatel’nostnaya igra. T. 9. Kn. 2 [Organizational and Activity Game. Vol. 9. Pt. 2]. Moscow, Nasledie MMK Publ., 2005, pp. 232–245.
10. Shchedrovicky G. P. Myshlenie – Ponimanie – Refleksiya [Thinking – Understanding – Reflection]. Moscow, Nasledie MMK Publ., 2005. 800 p.
11. Shchedrovicky G. P. [Guide to the Methodology of Organization, Leadership and Management]. In: Gumanitarnyj portal. Available at: https://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/3344 (accessed: 10.03.2022).
12. Rorty R. M. The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2019. 416 p.