Preview

Contemporary Philosophical Research

Advanced search

COMMUNICATIVE FUNCTION OF MIRROR NEURONS: TO THE THEORY OF MASS MEDIA

https://doi.org/ 10.18384/2310-7227-2017-4-102-113

Abstract

In the conditions of the growing role of mass media in the society the relevance of a problem of ontologic reliability of widely broadcast ideas of reality also grows. To specify the mass media ability to create the imitated copy of reality the author addresses the data of modern neuroscience on the so-called brain mirror cells. Neuroscientific research shows that at multiple socially approved repetitions the brain can confuse the real object of reflection with its imitation. The author’s purpose is to carry out a correlative analysis of the two phenomena for which the function of ensuring communication is the leading one. They are the following: (1) copying and self-copying activity of mirror neurons of the brain and (2) construction of an imitated copy of the reality by means of the mass media which are tuned to their own reproduction through variable repetitions. Such an approach to the research of the imitating properties of mirror neurons of the brain and the actions of mass media is rather new. The sharpness of the relevance of this research is determined by the fact that artificially designed welfare representation which is constantly repeated in communication is capable of providing changes in cortical representation (Turner, Whitehead, 2008; Burton, 2013). The research problems are (1) to specify neurological factors of the possibility of broad social communication; (2) to reveal a problem link in understanding the communicative function of mirror neurons in neuroscientific research; (3) to establish a categorial basis of cross-disciplinary communications in the research of the problem of imitation of the copy of reality and (4) to define a role of philosophy in forming a cross-disciplinary methodological base for search of the solution of the specified problem. The main conclusion of the research is that the philosophical category “formal semiotic matrix” can be the basis for cross-disciplinary research of the problem of imitation of the copy of reality. The matrix contains the understanding of transformation of specifically biological mechanisms of imitation of reality (in the form of mimicry and recursion) that, being transferred into human communication, have to consider the fundamental social and anthropological bases of practical rationality of a person which are not covered by narrow scientism with its principles of empiricism and economy of resources by all means. The main methods of the research are analogy method, methods of comparative and cross-disciplinary analysis. The theoretical value of this research consists in the specification of the connection between neurological and social conditions of social communication, mass media. Such direction of the research also creates new prospects in studying the potential of consciousness, reflection. The practical application of this research is in strengthening the opportunities of self-checking and public management of the growing tendency of artificial imitation of the reality extending due to technologies of neuromarketing.

About the Author

Larisa V. Mureyko
Alexander I St. Petersburg State Transport University
Russian Federation


References

1. Бёртон Р. Разум vs мозг / пер. с англ. Ю.В. Рябининой. М.: Э, 2016. 304 с.

2. Луман Н. Реальность массмедиа / пер. с нем. А.Ю. Антоновского. М.: Праксис, 2005. 256 с.

3. Луман Н. Социальные системы: очерк общей теории / пер. с нем. И.Д. Газиева; под ред. Н.А. Головина. СПб.: Наука, 2007. 648 с.

4. Матурана У., Варела Ф. Древо познания: биологические корни человеческого понимания / пер. с англ. Ю.А. Данилова. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2001. 223 с.

5. Мурейко Л.В. Мимезис и рекурсия: к проблеме социальной коммуникации в эпистемологическом аспекте // Научно-технические ведомости Санкт-Петербургского государственного политехнического университета. Серия: Гуманитарные и общественные науки. 2016. № 4 (255). С. 132-138.

6. Мурейко Л.В. Практическая рациональность: к проблеме массового сознания // Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А.И. Герцена. 2009. № 114. С. 113-123.

7. Мурейко Л.В., Бахтин М.В., Клименко И.И. Фактор времени в массовом сознании: эпистемологический аспект проблемы // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Философские науки. 2012. № 1 С. 20-33.

8. Самылов О.В. «Альтернативная история» и классическая интерпретация принципа историзма // Социально-гуманитарные знания. 2013. № 1. С. 56-68.

9. Табачникова С. Комментарии // Фуко М. Воля к истине: по ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. Работы разных лет. М.: Касталь, 1996. С. 327-396.

10. Черниговская Т.В. Когнитивный романтизм в зеркале контекстов // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2006. Т. IX. № 3. С. 71-77.

11. Философия коммуникации. Теоретико-методологические аспекты: монография / под ред. С.В. Клягина, О.Д. Шипуновой. СПб.: Издательство Политехнического университета, 2017. 272 с.

12. Фуко М. Воля к истине: по ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. Работы разных лет. М.: Касталь, 1996. 448 с.

13. Фуко М. Надзирать и наказывать. Рождение тюрьмы / пер. с франц. В. Наумова. М.: Ad Marginem, 1999. 480 с.

14. Arbib M.A., Rizzolatti G. Neural expectations: A possible evolutionary path from manual skills to language // Communication and Cognition. 1997. No. 29. P. 393-424.

15. Damasio A. Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books, 1995. 313 p.

16. Goldman A. Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. London: Oxford University Press, 2006. 384 p.

17. Iacaboni M. Imitation, Empathy, and Mirror Neurons // Annual Review of Psychology. 2009. No. 60. P. 653-670.

18. Lieberman M. Social Cognitive Neuroscience: A Review of Core Processes // The Annual Review of Psychology. 2007. No. 58. P. 259-289.

19. Mirror Neurons Also Respond to Language and Sound // SEEDMAGAZINE.com. URL: http://seedmagazine.com/content/print/mirror_neurons_also_respond_to_language_and_sound (дата обращения: 30.11.2017).

20. Ramachandran V.S. The tell-take brain [Электронный ресурс] // Indian Institute of Technology - Jodhpur: [сайт]. URL: http://home.iitj.ac.in/~gk/Psyche/listed/10.%20The%20Tell-Tale%20Brain%20-%20V%20S%20Ramachandran.pdf (дата обращения: 30.11.2017).

21. Thompson H. Empathetic mirror neurons found in humans at last [Электронный ресурс] // New Scientist: [сайт]. URL: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627565.600-empathetic-mirror-neurons-found-in-humans-at-last (дата обращения: 30.11.2017).

22. Wheeler M.E., Fiske S.T. Controlling Racial Prejudice. Social-Cognitive Goals Affect Amygdala and Stereotype Activation // Psychological Science. 2005. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 56-63.


Review

Views: 66


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5121 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5148 (Online)