Socio-Philosophical Analysis of Universities’ Value Orientations
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2025-3-114-123
Abstract
Aim. To conduct a socio-philosophical analysis of the value orientations of universities.
Methodology. Integrated approach to the study of models of university structures, monitoring corporate social responsibility, theoretical and philosophical analysis of socio-economic and scientific potential are the methods used in the study.
Results. It is revealed that the value orientations of modern universities may vary; these differences depend on the specifics of their activities and the main directions: research, economic, social, political and environmental, the relationship and interdependence of which is predetermined by spiritual and moral values.
Research implications. The results of the study can be used in a detailed study of the specific activities of universities, the definition of evaluation criteria, value orientations of educational technologies in combination with hybrid forms of education.
About the Authors
V. P. MaikovaRussian Federation
Valentina P. Maikova – Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Department of Philosophy
Moscow
E. M. Molchan
Russian Federation
Eduard M. Molchan – Cand. Sci. (Education), Assoc. Prof., Department of Philosophy
Moscow
References
1. Lipich, T. I. (2023). Socio-Demographic Policy as a Factor of National Security, and the Role of Educational Values in Modern Education. In: Science. Technology. Man: Historical, Ideological and Methodological Problems. Iss. 13. Vol. 1. Moscow: Zhukovsky Academy publ., pp. 137–142 (in Russ.).
2. Volodina, L. O. (2023). Spiritual and Moral Values of Education in the State Educational Policy. In: Source, 1 (117), 21–22 (in Russ.).
3. Gorina, E. E. (2022). The Role of Educational Organizations in the Implementation of State Policy on the Preservation of Traditional Spiritual and Moral Values. In: Social Relations, 4 (43), 28–34 (in Russ.).
4. Boguslavsky, M. V. (2022). Conceptualization of Modern Educational Policy Based on Civic-Patriotic Values. In: Education in the Modern World: New Times – New Solutions: Collection of Scientific Articles Based on the Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference – the XVI Osovskie Pedagogical Readings, Saransk, November 17–18, 2022. Pt. 1. Moscow: Moscow City University publ., pp. 105–109 (in Russ.).
5. Sobolevskaya, T. G. (2021). The Role of Technical Universities in the Formation of a Single Scientific, Technological and Educational Space of the CIS. In: International Cooperation of Universities of the Member States of the Commonwealth of Independent States. Moscow: Association of Technical Universities Publ., pp. 99–104 (in Russ.).
6. Dianov, S. A. (2023). Political Science Education in the Educational Space of an Advanced University: Value-Semantic Foundations. In: Conflict Studies / Nota Bene, 1, 73–81. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0617.2023.1.39902 (in Russ.).
7. Maikova, V. P. & Molchan, E. M. (2024). Ethical Principles of Using Artificial Intelligence in Environmental Education. In: Russian Engineer: Collection of Abstracts of the II All-Russian Congress with International Participation, Moscow, October 30 – November 1, 2024. Moscow: Bauman Moscow State Technical University Publ., pp. 290–291 (in Russ.).
8. Mokiy, V. S. (2023). On the Universities’ Responsibility for Achieving the Results of Development and Continuous Self-Renewal of Society. In: Universum: Psychology and Education: Electronic Scientific Journal, 9 (111). Available at: https://7universum.com/ru/psy/archive/item/15903 (accessed: 01.09.2025) (in Russ.).
9. Maikova, V. P., Molchan, E. M., Ilchenko, D. A., Zadremaylov, O. I. & Markov, E. V. (2024). Actual Issues of the History and Philosophy of Science. Sergiev Posad: A. A. Larkin Publ. (in Russ.).





















