On the Issue of Human Value in the Context of Project Activity
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2025-2-66-74
Abstract
Aim. To identify the value, place and role of human in project activities.
Methodology. The essence and content of social design are analyzed from the point of view of dialectical and axiological approaches. In order to identify the human value in project activities, methods of analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction were used. The application of the methodology of the system-integrative approach made it possible to consider project activity as an integral process, and the situational approach allowed us to identify the features of motivation for project activities of various categories of its participants.
Results. From the standpoint of the axiological approach, a characteristic of social design is given and the influence of human values as the highest value-goals on it is substantiated. It is revealed that the key meanings of project activity are the public benefit and satisfaction of the needs of project participants, which are dialectically interrelated. At the same time, the conditions for the successful implementation of project activities there is harmony between the public benefit of the project and its orientation to the needs and goals of the project participants, as well as the recognition of a person as a value throughout all stages of design.
Research implications. The article substantiates the values of human and society as the axiological foundations of project activity and their impact on the process and results of social design at its various stages.
About the Author
A. B. BakuradzeRussian Federation
Andrey B. Bakuradze– Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Head of the Department, Department of Theory and Practice of Continuing Cossack Education
Moscow
References
1. Campbell, K. (2009). The One-Page Project Manager: Communicate and Manage Any Project with a Single Sheet of Paper. Moscow: Dialectics Publ. (in Russ.).
2. Belbin, M. (2003). Management Teams. Secrets of Success and Causes of Failures. Moscow: HIPPO Publ. (in Russ.).
3. Ushakov, K. M. (2004). Organization Development: in Search of Adequate Theories. Moscow: IF September Publ. (in Russ.).
4. Barinova, G. V., Bakuradze, A. B. & Klimov, S. N., eds. (2018). E-learning and Distance Educational Technologies in Modern Higher Technical School. Moscow: Russian University of Transport Publ. (in Russ.).
5. Avetisyan, A. A., comp. (1955). Ancient Philosophers (testimonies, fragments, texts). Kyiv: State University Publishing House (in Russ.).
6. Gubman, B. L. & Anufrieva, K. V. (2024). Hermeneutics and the Teachings of I. Kant: Reflective Capacity of Judgment in the Formation of the Semantic Horizon of the Human World. In: Philosophy and Culture in the Humanitarian Discourse: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Methodological Conference (Voronezh, April 24–25, 2024). Voronezh: Istoki Publ., pp. 99–103 (in Russ.).
7. Adizes, I. (2021). The Ideal Executive. Moscow: Alpina Publisher (in Russ.).
8. Bakuradze, A. B. (2024). Axiology of Social Organization Management. Moscow: Rusains Publ. (in Russ.).
9. George, J. M. & Jones, G. R. (2003). Organizational behavior. Fundamentals of management. Moscow: UNITY-DANA Publ. (in Russ.).
10. Panshin, A. I. (2022). Middle class: history of definition. In: Philosophical and methodological problems of the study of Russian society: collected papers of the V International Scientific Conference (Moscow, November 25, 2021). Moscow: Russian University of Transport Publ., pp. 312–315 (in Russ.).
11. Mikhalkin, N. V. (2022). Patterns of optimal organization of society and principles, norms of effective management of this process. In: Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: Philosophy, 4 (62), 46–55. DOI: 10.26456/vtphilos/2022.4.046 (in Russ.).
12. Mikhalkin, A. N. (2025). Dynamics of Change and Fulfilment of Social Duties by the State Authorities of Russia in the 20th – 21st Centuries [dissertation]. Moscow, 2025 (in Russ.).