The Formation of a New Social Reality (Humanism vs Artificial Intelligence)
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2025-1-33-39
Abstract
Aim. The article provides a description of the main transformational features of modern social relationships associated with the collapse of humanism, the tendency for a person to lose his identity and alienate himself from his essence.
Methodology. The work was carried out on the basis of a systematic approach using classification and comparative analysis methods.
Results. It was established that the new social reality is inextricably linked with the digital revolution, which gave rise not only to the ideas of transhumanism, but also influenced the practical changes of man as a biological being. Deep transformations are associated with the impact of information on the consciousness and memory of people. Blogging as communication with a virtual artificial subject is becoming a replacement for real forms of communication between people.
Research implications. The authors of the article come to the conclusion that modern social reality is the formation of a digital person and a digital society as a manifestation of pseudo-humanism.
Keywords
About the Authors
Ya. V. Bondareva
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yana V. Bondareva – Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Head of the Department, Department of Philosophy
Moscow
G. A. Zhavoronkova
Federal State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Galina A. Zhavoronkova – Postgraduate Student, Department of Philosophy, Federal State University of Education
Moscow
References
1. Mitkina, S. A. (2015). The Category of Humanity in Chinese Cultural and Philosophical Tradition. In: Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2, 300–337. DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2015.2.35 (in Russ.).
2. Aralova, E. V. (2015). Spirituality and Humanism in the period of Renaissance. In: Authority, 3, 48–52. (in Russ.).
3. Chizhov, P. G. (2004). The Spirit of Humanism in the Philosophy of I. Kant. In: The Universal and the National in Philosophy: Kantian Readings at KRSU, April 22, 2004; II International Scientific and Practical Conference of KRSU, May 27–28, 2004: materials of presentations. Bishkek, Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University Publ., pp. 92–95 (in Russ.).
4. Motorina, L. E. (2016). Methodological Potential of the Fundamental Anthropological Constants. In: Human Being: Image and Essence Humanitarian Aspects, 1 (27), 19–28. (in Russ.).
5. Heidegger, M. (2020). Toward Philosophy (On Being). Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ. (in Russ.).
6. Jaspers, K. (2024). Crossing the Line: Stories about Mine. Moscow: Algorithm Publ. (in Russ.).
7. Huxley, J. (1971). The Amazing World of Evolution. Moscow: Mir Publ. (in Russ.).
8. Motorina, L. E. (2016). Methodological Potential of Fundamental Anthropological Constants. In: Human Being: Image and Essence Humanitarian Aspects, 1 (27), 19–28 (in Russ.).
9. Platoshina, V. V. (2022). The Meaning of Human Life in the Philosophy of Transhumanism. In: Science. Technology. Man: Historical, Ideological and Methodological Problems, 1 (12), 174–178. (in Russ.).
10. Petrov, S. T. (2022). Digital Revolution. Digital Economy. Digital Noosphere. Moscow: Pero Publ. (in Russ.).
11. Samoylenko, E. V. & Trunov, A. I. (2022). Digitalization of Man: the Flourishing of Intellectuality or Degradation? In: Science. Technology. Man: Historical, Ideological and Methodological Problems, 1 (12), 186–190 (in Russ.).
12. Abilkenova, V. A. (2022). Will Blogging Become a Profession? (Blogging – a New Phenomenon among Professions?). In: Vedomosti Applied Ethics, 59, 141–156. (in Russ.).
13. Tegmark, M. (2019). Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Moscow: Corpus Publ. (in Russ.).
Review
Views:
50
Email this article 