Philosophical Optics: the Legacy of Rene Descartes and Isaac Newton
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2025-1-22-32
Abstract
Aim. An assessment of the essence of philosophical conceptions, understandings and the place of Rene Descartes and Isaac Newton in the formation and development of the theory of light.
Methodology. The research used methods of comparative analysis, historical, dialectical approaches to reconstruct the history of science and philosophy.
Results. Two epistemological positions in understanding the theory of light are given. The experiments and judgments of philosophers formed the field of knowledge – physics. Descartes and Newton were philosophers and scientists whose innovative ideas modern optics was built on, the design and production of optical devices for all spheres of human activity is carried out. Descartes was engaged in geometric optics in the field of natural science. The main achievement of Rene Descartes was the exposition of the law of refraction of light. Based on the formulated law, Descartes gave for the first time a correct explanation of the rainbow. Thanks to Descartes, the theory of optical devices appeared, and after Descartes geometric optics became a part of geometry. Isaac Newton overcame the contradiction between empiricism and rationalism in the practice of scientific research. His science was based on facts and experience, he widely used mathematical methods and the deductive method in research. Newton developed the corpuscular theory of light and discovered the phenomenon of dispersion of light in a prism.
Research implications. The results of the study contribute to the epistemology and methodological basis of the philosophy of science and technology.
About the Authors
E. A. Badeeva
Penza State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena A. Badeeva) – Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Prof., Department of Radio Engineering and Radioelectronic Systems, Department of Economics and Finance
Penza
G. M. Kirillov
Penza State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
German M. Kirillov – Dr. Sci. (Phylosophy), Assoc. Prof., Department of Philosophy and Social Communications
Penza
V. A. Badeev
Penza State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladislav A. Badeev – Laboratory Assistant Researcher, Scientific Research Center “Nanotechnology of Fiber-Optic Systems”, Department of Instrument Engineering
Penza
References
1. Terekhovich, V. E. (2020). Does philosophy really important to physics to leave it for the request of philosophes? In: Metaphysics, 1 (35), 8–29. DOI: 10.22363/2224-7580-2020-1-8-29 (in Russ.).
2. Yanovsky, M. I. & Yanovskaya, L. V. (2019). Aristotelianism as the Basis of the Western World View. In: Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 29 (4), 402–412. DOI: 10.35634/2412-9550-2019-29-4-402-412 (in Russ.).
3. Lebedev, S. A. & Rebrishchev, V. D. (2024). Philosophical foundations of classical, non-classical and post-non-classical science. In: Modern philosophical studies, 1, 57–66 (in Russ.).
4. Brekotkina, I. P. (2020). Modern Rationalism and epistemological ideas of Rene Descartes. In: Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 3, 237–243. DOI: 10.35634/2412-9550-2020-30-3-237-243 (in Russ.).
5. Ignatova, N. Yu. (2023).The Philosophical Figure of Descartes in Domestic Philosophy of the XX Century. In: Bulletin of Tula State University. Humanities, 2, 179–192. DOI: 10.24412/2071-6141-2023-2-179-192 (in Russ.).
6. Davydova, A. M. (2019). The History of the Formation of the Modern Theory of Gravitation. In: Colloquium-journal, 1 (25), 37–38. (in Russ.).
7. Descartes, R. (1953). Discourse on the Method: with Appendices. Dioptrics, Meteors, Geometry. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences Publ. (in Russ.).
8. Newton, I. (1989). Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (in Russ.).
9. Newton, I (1927). Optics, or a Treatise on Reflections, Refractions, Bendings, and Colors of Light. Moscow, Leningrad: State Publishing House (in Russ.).
10. Kuzin, V. I. (2023). What is Philosophy? In: Ideas and Ideals, 1, 11–34. DOI: 10.17212/2075-0862-2023-15.1.1-11-34 (in Russ.).
11. Varlamov, S. D. (2013). Why Rainbows Are Different. In: Quantum, 1, 46–48. (in Russ.).
12. Panov, A. (2016). Descartes-Newton-Young Rainbow. In: Quantum, 3, 10–14 (in Russ.).
13. Fara, P. (2015). Newton shows the light: a commentary on Newton (1672) ‘A letter … containing his new theory about light and colours…’. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 15 (2039). DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2014.0213
14. Knyazev, V. N. (2018). IIsaac Newton: Scientist and Philosopher (towards 375th Anniversary of His Birth). In: Economic and Social-Humanitarian Studies, 1 (17), 215–220 (in Russ.).
Review
Views:
131
Email this article 