Preview

Contemporary Philosophical Research

Advanced search

Human Technotypes. Part I: Homo Computeris, Homo Informaticus, Homo Network

https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2024-1-120-128

Abstract

Aim. To trace the evolution and characterize the specifics of the leading human technotypes, including the images Homo Computeris, Homo Informaticus and Homo Network.

Methodology. In accordance with the stated purpose, the concept of “technotype” is explicated in the research, the main human technotypes are distinguished and characterized, the sequence of their formation is traced, their complementarity in terms of the modern human characteristics of and his technologized being is proved. The research applies methods of analysis and synthesis, comparative and descriptive, historical, and logical methods. A predictive method is also used to characterize the features of human techno-bio-evolution and to realize its potential consequences, both positive and negative.

Results. The research substantiates the concept of an anthropological “technotype”. The authors propose to understand “technotypes” as the new formats of human beings that have developed as a result of the impact on them of a complex of innovative achievements in the field of modern technics and technology. The evolution of anthropological technotypes is traced, starting with the type of Homo Computeris, including the type of Homo Informaticus and ending with the type of Homo Network. These technological types are characterized in the context of the type of society that determines them (information society, network society). The existential models determining technotypes are identified and analyzed, including the “Human / Machine” and “Human / Network” models.

Research implications. The theoretical significance of the study is related to the explication of the concept of “technotype” in an anthropological way, as well as to the identification and later characterization of the leading human technotypes in the context of the processes of computerization, informatization, and network development that determine them. The practical significance of the research lies in the fact that its provisions and conclusions can be used to clarify the identity of humans in a technologized world, coordinate their behavior and activities in an exponential growth of technical innovations and technological solutions.

About the Authors

A. V. Guryanova
Samara State University of Economics
Russian Federation

Anna V. Guryanova – Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Prof., Head of the Department, Philosophy and History Department

ul. Sovetskoi Armii 141, Samara 443090, Samara Region



A. V. Timofeev
Samara National Research University
Russian Federation

Alexander V. Timofeev Cand. Sci. (Pedagogics), Assoc. Prof., Department of Information Systems and Technologies

ul. Moskovskoe shosse 34, Samara 443086, Samara Region



References

1. Alekseeva I. Yu., Arshinov V. I., Cheklecov V. V. [“Technopeople” versus “Posthumans”: NBICS Revolution and the Future of Man]. In: Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy], 2013, no. 3, pp. 12–21.

2. Gur’yanova A. V. [The Phenomenon of Homo Informaticus – A New Dimension of Human Existence]. In: Problemy chelovecheskoj ekzistencii v informacionnom obshchestve [Problems of Human Existence in the Information Society]. Samara, Samara State Economic University Publ., 2015, pp. 203–220.

3. Guryanova A. V., Timofeev A. V. [Noospheric Globalization in the Context of the Sustainable Development Model]. In: Ekonomicheskie i social’no-gumanitarnye issledovaniya [Economic and SocialHumanitarian Studies], 2023, no. 1 (37), pp. 103–110.

4. Elyakov A. D. [Homo Informaticus and Modern Informational Environment]. In: Filosofiya i obshchestvo [Philosophy and Society], 2012, no. 3 (67), pp. 38–59.

5. Konnov V. S. [Emergence of the Information Society as a Result of Globalized World]. In: Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo social’no-ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Saratov State Socio-Economic University], 2009, no. 3, pp. 36–38.

6. Mitroshenkov O. A. [What will Replace Postmodernism?]. In: [Metamodern. Journal about Metamodernism]. Available at: https://metamodernizm.ru/chto-pridet-na-smenu-postmodernizmu (accessed: 12.01.2024).

7. Plotnikov E. I. [Man in the Era of High Technology]. In: Fundamental’nye nauchnye issledovaniya kak faktor obespecheniya konkurentosposobnosti obshchestva i gosudarstva [Fundamental Scientific Research as a Factor in Ensuring the Competitiveness of Society and the State]. Belgorod, APNI Publ., 2020, pp. 51–54.

8. Senkevich A. V. [“Network Man”: Ethical and Anthropological Aspects of Communication in Modern Society]. In: Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta vysokih tekhnologij [Bulletin of the Voronezh Institute of High Technologies], 2017, no. 11 (4), pp. 217–220.

9. Skorodumova O. B., Melamud V. E. [Computerization]. In: Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill], 2005, no. 3, pp. 211–213.

10. Chisteaykov S. V. [Concept of the Network Person]. In: Ekonomika obrazovaniya [Economics of Education], 2009, no. 2, pp. 38–41.

11. Guryanova A. V., Krasnov S. V., Frolov V. A. Human Transformation under an Influence of the Digital Economy Development. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2020, vol. 908, pp. 140–149.


Review

Views: 151


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5121 (Print)
ISSN 2949-5148 (Online)