Possibility of Implementing the Principle of Conciliarity in Network Communication Environment

Aim. To establish the prerequisites for the implementation of the principle of conciliarity through network communication in a mass information society.

Methodology. The methodological basis for the research is the social and philosophical analysis of the urgent problems of modern social consciousness, the institutional ties of society and ensuring the sustainability of social life.

Results.  The relevance of the principle of conciliarity in the search for a model of development of modern Russian society is established. The relevance of this principle is presented in connection with its goal-setting, which contains both positive development tasks and the imperative of preserving individual freedom. The contradictory nature of the network communication environment is revealed, which presupposes the protection of the information space from destructive destructive actors and meanings. It is proposed to protect the discussion network space from extremist influences, first of all, relying on the conciliar opinion of the majority to identify a real effective social norm and attitude.

Research implications. The appeal to the principle of conciliarity in connection with determining the parameters of activity in the space of the network communication environment will contribute to the search for a national consensus, finding effective positive social goal-setting, as well as the creation of such mechanisms for regulating the information space that would not be reduced to certain restrictions on freedom of expression.

1. Berdyaev N. A. Aleksej Stepanovich Homyakov [Alexey Stepanovich Khomyakov]. Moscow, RUGRAM Publ., 2022. 256 p.

2. Berkut V. P. [Socio-Philosophical Analysis in of Scientific Knowledge Methodology]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofskie nauki [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Philosophy], 2016, no. 1, pp. 14–23.

3. Bondareva Ya. V. [Russian Religious and Philosophical Anthropology: Antinomy of Freedom and Determinism]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofskie nauki [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Philosophy], 2014, no. 1, pp. 47–53.

4. Zalozhnych Yu. S. [Development of Slavo-philic Concepts of National Statehood and Power in Public Thought of Modern Russia]. In: Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya [Bulletin of Tver State University. Series: Philosophy], 2021, no. 2 (56), pp. 161–169.

5. Esaulov I. A. [Christian Foundation of Russian Literature: Conciliarity]. In: Literaturnaya uchyoba [Literary Studies], 1998, no. 1, pp. 105–123.

6. Kireevsky I. V. O haraktere prosveshcheniya Evropy i o ego otnoshenii k prosveshcheniyu Rossii [On the Nature of the Enlightenment of Europe and Its Relationship to the Education of Russia]. Moscow, ARCHIVE PUBLICA Publ., 2022. 70 p.

7. Kireevsky I. V. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij. T. 1 [Complete Works. Vol. 1]. Moscow, Moscow Imperial University Publ., 1911. 288 p.

8. Lopin R. A., Pocheptsov S. S. [The Problem of Innovative Traditionalism in Slavophile Philosophy]. In: NOMOTHETIKA: Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Pravo [NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Right], 2022, no. 47 (1), pp. 47–52.

9. Lossky N. O. Istoriya russkoj filosofii [History of Russian Philosophy]. Moscow, Akademicheskij proekt Publ., 2018. 551 p.

10. Homyakov A. S. Izbrannye filosofskie sochineniya. T. 2 [Selected Philosophical Works. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Yurajt Publ., 2023. 375 p.