Semantic Procedure: Setting the Value Field. Article II
https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2023-4-19-35
Abstract
Aim. To explicate the essence of establishing meaning in a hermeneutic procedure.
Methodology. Correlative techniques for correlating figurative and expressive contexts with relevant information fields were applied in the research.
Results. It is shown that the meaningful filling of abstractions is carried out by the projection of the information-figurative dimension of thought on the subject-matter realities using specific techniques: attribution; predication; essentialization; reification; description; characterization; interpretation; modeling; ontologization; operationalization; objectification; verification; ostensitization, etc.
Research implications. A critical and analytical study of innovations produced by a productive expanding synthesis leads to the need to consider their internal architecture (constitution, configuration, composition, etc.) as a marker of cognitive viability.
About the Authors
V. Ilyin
State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ul. Very Voloshinoi 24, Mytishchi 141014, Moscow Region
I. Kokoeva
State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ul. Very Voloshinoi 24, Mytishchi 141014, Moscow Region
P. Rodin
State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ul. Very Voloshinoi 24, Mytishchi 141014, Moscow Region
A. Shimko
State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ul. Very Voloshinoi 24, Mytishchi 141014, Moscow Region
Ya. Yalovenko
Moscow State Technical University named after N. E. Bauman (Kaluga branch)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ul. Bazhenova 2, Kaluga 248000
References
1. Aristotle. Analytica Priora (Rus. ed.: Foht. B. A., transl. Analitiki pervaya i vtoraya. Leningrad, Gospolitizdat Publ., 1952. 439 p.).
2. Bulgakov S. N. Dva grada: issledovanie o prirode obshchestvennyh idealov [Two Cities: A Study of the Nature of Social Ideals]. St. Petersburg, Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute Publ., 2002. 587 p.
3. Vladimirov Yu. S. [Metaphysical Origins of the Confrontation between Science and Religion]. In: Dva grada. Dialog nauki i religii [Two Cities. Dialogue between Science and Religion]. Kaluga, N. Bochkareva Publ., 2002, pp. 290–304.
4. Gachev G. D. Nauka i nacional’nye kul’tury [Science and National Cultures]. Rostov on Don, Rostov University Publ., 1992. 316 p.
5. Husserl E. G. Die Krisis Der Europainschen Wissenschaften Und Die Transzendentale Phanomenologie (Russ. ed.: Sklyadnev D. V., transl. Krizis evropejskih nauk i transcendental’naya fenomenologiya. St. Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’, 2004. 400 p.).
6. Esenin-Vol’pin A. S. [To the Second Hilbert Problem]. In: Problemy Gil’berta [Gilbert's Problems]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1969, pp. 83–91.
7. Ilyin V. V. Teoriya poznaniya. Simvologiya. Teoriya simvolicheskih form [Theory of Knowledge. Symbolology. Theory of Symbolic Forms]. Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 2013. 384 p.
8. Ilyin V. V. Teoriya poznaniya. Social’naya epistemologiya. Sociologiya znaniya [Theory of Knowledge. Social Epistemology. Sociology of Knowledge]. Moscow, Gaudeamus Publ., Akademicheskij proekt Publ., 2014. 203 p.
9. Ilyin V. V. Teoriya poznaniya. Evristika. Kreatologiya [Theory of Knowledge. Heuristic. Creatology]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2018. 176 p.
10. Carnot L. Lazare Réflexions sur la métaphysique du calcul infinitésimal (Rus. ed.: Solov’ev N. M., transl. Razmyshleniya o metafizike ischisleniya beskonechno malyh. Moscow, Leningrad, United Scientific and Technical Publ., 1936. 352 p.).
11. Courant R. Vorlesungen über Differential- und Integralrechnung (Rus. ed.: Libin Z. G., Rabinovich Yu. L., transls. Kurs differencial’nogo i integral’nogo ischisleniya. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1967. 407 p.).
12. Lukasevich Ya. Aristotelevskaya sillogistika s tochki zreniya sovremennoj formal’noj logiki [Aristotelian Syllogistic from the Point of View of Modern Formal Logic]. Moscow, Foreign Literature Publ., 1959. 312 p.
13. Kopcik V. A., compl. Sinergeticheskaya paradigma. Nelinejnoe myshlenie v nauke i iskusstve [Synergetic Paradigm. Nonlinear Thinking in Science and Art]. Moscow, Progress-Tradiciya Publ., 2002. 495 p.
14. Tynyanov Yu. N. Literaturnaya evolyuciya [Literary Evolution]. Moscow, Agraf Publ., 2002. 496 p.
15. Stepun F. Liki kul’tury [Faces of Culture]. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 1994. 704 p.
16. Frege G. Selected Works (Rus. ed.: Anashvili V. V., Nikiforov A. L., comps. Izbrannye raboty. Moscow, Dom intellektual’noi knigi Publ., 1997. 159 p.).
17. Euler L. Mechanica, sive Motus scientia analytice exposita. Theoria motuum planetarum et cometarum (Rus. ed.: Gofman V. S., Kondrat’ev S. P., transl. Mekhanika. Osnovy dinamiki tochki. Moscow, Leningrad, United Scientific and Technical Publishing House of the NKTP USSR Publ., 1938. 499 p.).
18. Birkhoff G. D. Aesthetik Measure. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1932. 226 p.
19. Alembert D’. Mélanges de litérature, d’histoire, et de philosophie. Berlin, Paris, Briasson, 1753. 364 p.
20. Husserl E. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen (Philosophie Husseriana. Bd. III. Den Haag). Berlin, Springer, 1977. 533 p.
21. Wheeler J. A. From Relativity to Mutability. In: The Physicist’s Conception of Nature. Dordrecht, Boston, Springer, 1973, pp. 202–247.
Review
Views:
85
Email this article 