<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">philosoph</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Современные философские исследования</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Contemporary Philosophical Research</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2949-5121</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2949-5148</issn><publisher><publisher-name>State University of Education</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">philosoph-756</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Богословие как историософская схема: рассуждения о тринитарной концепции
Иоахима Флорского</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Theology as a historical schema: speculations about trinitarian conceptions of Joachim of Flore</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Собко</surname><given-names>Руслан Васильевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">my.office.center@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="ru" id="aff-1"><institution>Нижегородский государственный педагогический университет</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2011</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>01</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>110</fpage><lpage>115</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Собко Р.В., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Собко Р.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Собко Р.В.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.philosmgou.ru/jour/article/view/756">https://www.philosmgou.ru/jour/article/view/756</self-uri><abstract><p>В данной статье рассмотрены характер-
ные особенности тринитарного богословия средневекового
мыслителя Иоахима Флорского, используемого им в качес-
тве историософской схемы. Во введении проанализирован
терминологический аппарат Флорского аббата, прежде
всего, такие понятия, как «status», «aetas» и «tempus». Да-
лее исследованы понятия prima definitio и secunda definitio.
Если схема prima definitio - т. е. деление всемирной исто-
рии на три эпохи - достаточно известна русскоязычному
читателю, то понятию secunda definitio в отечественной
историософии уделяется сравнительно мало внимания.
Аббат считал, что вся история (люди, события, обществен-
ные институты) есть не что иное, как отражение внутрен-
ней идеальной природы Пресвятой Троицы. Концепция
трёх исторических эпох Отца, Сына и Святого Духа поз-
волила как средневековым, так и современным учёным
считать Иоахима Флорского антитринитарием. Исследо-
вание secunda definitio как отражения основных принципов
католического богословия позволяет уравновесить эти
обвинения иллюстрацией «неслитного и нераздельного»
единства и симбиоза всех исторических эпох. История, по
мнению Иоахима Флорского, была сложным процессом, в
пределах которого ряд ключевых элементов развивается
от начала до полной реализации своих целей.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article deals with some specific problems,
concerning certain characteristics of Joachims Trinitarian
theology used as a key to the philosophy of history. It emphasizes
particular qualities of his critical apparatus such
as «status», «aetas» and «tempus». Joachim shared with
many of his contemporaries the conviction that nature, persons
and events pointed beyond themselves to transcendent
realities. It was in this medieval and monastic environment
that Joachim formulated his theology of history. Focusing
particular attention on Joachims three-state schema of history,
modern Russian scholars lack for studying his Trinitarian
conceptions. Joachim assumed that God had given the
world, and particularly the history of the chosen people, a
multidimensional order and symmetry which reflects the Trinity
and its mysteries. The exegetical plan of Joachims four
major commentaries reveals that history for the abbot is an
allegory of the Trinity. Joachims various historical schemata:
two times, three states, and seven ages - are the symmetry
of the catholic doctrine of the Trinity.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Иоахим Флорский</kwd><kwd>филиокве</kwd><kwd>историософия</kwd><kwd>статус</kwd><kwd>этас</kwd><kwd>темпус</kwd><kwd>Мережковский</kwd><kwd>Соловьев</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>status</kwd><kwd>aetas</kwd><kwd>tempus</kwd><kwd>Solovjev</kwd><kwd>Merezhkovsky</kwd><kwd>filioque</kwd><kwd>philosophy of history</kwd><kwd>Joachim of Fiore</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Д ворецкий И. Х. Латинско-русский словарь / И.Х. Дворецкий. М.: Русский язык-Медиа, 2008.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Д ворецкий И. Х. Латинско-русский словарь / И.Х. Дворецкий. М.: Русский язык-Медиа, 2008.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Новый Завет Господа нашего Иисуса Христа Са- ратов: Издательство Саратовской епархии, 2008.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Новый Завет Господа нашего Иисуса Христа Са- ратов: Издательство Саратовской епархии, 2008.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Beatrice Hirsch-Reich. The Figurae of Joachim of Fiore. Oxford, 1972.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Beatrice Hirsch-Reich. The Figurae of Joachim of Fiore. Oxford, 1972.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ernst Benz. Evolution and Christian Hope, trans, byHeinz G. Frank. N.J., 1968.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ernst Benz. Evolution and Christian Hope, trans, byHeinz G. Frank. N.J., 1968.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Expositio in Apocalypsim. Venice, 1527; reprinted., Frankfurt a. M.: Minerva, 1964.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Expositio in Apocalypsim. Venice, 1527; reprinted., Frankfurt a. M.: Minerva, 1964.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Joseph A. Grau, Morality and the Human Future in the Thought of Teilhard de Chardin Rutherford.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Joseph A. Grau, Morality and the Human Future in the Thought of Teilhard de Chardin Rutherford.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liber de concordia novi ac veteris testamenti. Venice, 1519; reprinted Frankfurt a. M., 1964.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Liber de concordia novi ac veteris testamenti. Venice, 1519; reprinted Frankfurt a. M., 1964.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liber introductorius in Apocalypsim. Venice, 1527; reprinted Frankfurt a. M., 1964.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Liber introductorius in Apocalypsim. Venice, 1527; reprinted Frankfurt a. M., 1964.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liber Figurarum. Edited by M. Reeves, B. Hirsch- Reich, and L. Tondelli, in II libro delle figure. 2nd ed. Turin: Societa editrix internazionale, 1953.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Liber Figurarum. Edited by M. Reeves, B. Hirsch- Reich, and L. Tondelli, in II libro delle figure. 2nd ed. Turin: Societa editrix internazionale, 1953.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Marjorie Reeves. The Influence of Prophecy in the Later Middle Ages. Oxford, 1969.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marjorie Reeves. The Influence of Prophecy in the Later Middle Ages. Oxford, 1969.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Psalterium decem chordarum. Venice, 1527; reprinted Frankfurt a. M., 1964.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Psalterium decem chordarum. Venice, 1527; reprinted Frankfurt a. M., 1964.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tractatus super quatuor evangelia. Edited by E. Buonaiuti. Fonti per la storia d'ltalia. Rome, 1930.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tractatus super quatuor evangelia. Edited by E. Buonaiuti. Fonti per la storia d'ltalia. Rome, 1930.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
