<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">philosoph</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Современные философские исследования</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Contemporary Philosophical Research</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2949-5121</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2949-5148</issn><publisher><publisher-name>State University of Education</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18384/2949-5148-2025-3-35-44</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">philosoph-1420</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИСТОРИЯ ФИЛОСОФИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>«Свобода» и «сверхчеловек»: сравнительный взгляд на жизненные идеалы в китайской и западной философии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>“Serenity” and “Superman”: Comparative View on the Life Ideals in Chinese and Western Philosophy</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>У</surname><given-names>Ян</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>У Ян – аспирант кафедры философии</p><p>г. Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Yang Wu – Postgraduate Student, Department of Philosophy</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">wy990119@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Государственный университет просвещения</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Federal State University of Education</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>35</fpage><lpage>44</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; У Я., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">У Я.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Wu Y.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.philosmgou.ru/jour/article/view/1420">https://www.philosmgou.ru/jour/article/view/1420</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Цель</title><p>Цель. Сравнить философские концепции жизненных идеалов Чжуан-цзы и Ф. Ницше.</p></sec><sec><title>Процедура и методы</title><p>Процедура и методы. Работа выполнена на основе сопоставительного анализа понятий «сияющей свободы» и «сверхчеловека».</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. Выявлены общие черты: стремление к высшей форме жизни, критика традиционных ценностей – и различия: восточная гармония против западной воли к власти.</p><p>Теоретическая и/или практическая значимость. Обогащение межкультурного философского диалога, актуализация идеалов свободы в контексте современного гуманизма.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Aim</title><p>Aim. To compare Zhuangzi’s and Nietzsche’s philosophical ideas about life ideals.</p></sec><sec><title>Methodology</title><p>Methodology. Comparative analysis of the notions of “serene freedom” and “bermensch” was used in the study.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. Both similarities, that are searching for higher life and critique of values, and differences, which consist in Eastern harmony and Western will to power, have been revealed.</p></sec><sec><title>Research implications</title><p>Research implications. Enhancing intercultural philosophical dialogue and applying ideals of freedom to contemporary humanism are implications of the study.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>воля к власти</kwd><kwd>даосизм</kwd><kwd>жизненный идеал</kwd><kwd>сверхчеловек</kwd><kwd>свобода</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>freedom</kwd><kwd>bermensch</kwd><kwd>life ideal</kwd><kwd>Daoism</kwd><kwd>will to power</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">陈鼓应．老庄新论．北京:商务印书馆，2008．519 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">陈鼓应 (2008)．老庄新论．北京: 商务印书馆.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ницше Ф. Так говорил Заратустра. Шанхай: Восточно-Китайское педагогическое издательство, 2009. 1118 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nietzsche, F. (2009). Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Shanghai: East China Pedagogical publ., 2009. 1118 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">罗森．启蒙 的面具 :尼采 的《扎拉图斯特拉如是说》．吴松江，译．沈阳 :辽宁教育出版 社，2003．85 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">罗森 (2003)．启蒙 的面具 :尼采 的《扎拉图斯特拉如是说》．吴松江，译．沈阳 :辽宁教 育出版社.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">许美平．鲲鹏寓言 的定位 – 兼谈–条读《庄》义法 ．中国哲学史，2017 (1). P. 12–17．</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">许美平 (2017)．鲲鹏寓言 的定位 – 兼谈–条读《庄》义法 ．中国哲学史, 1, 12–17．</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">王朝华．《逍遥游》主旨论析 // 南昌大学学报(人文社 会科学版)，2014 (4). P. 44–49.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">王朝华 (2014)．《逍遥游》主旨论析．南昌大学学报(人文社 会科学版), 4, 44–49.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">涂早玲．中国古代“个体”思想的现代阐释–论儒家 “君子”之道与庄子“至人”追求的正 反合［J］// 哈尔滨 师范大学社会科学学报，2017 (3). P. 94–98．</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">涂早玲 (2017)．中国古代“个体”思想的现代阐释–论儒家 “君子”之道与庄子“至人”追 求的正反合［J］．哈尔滨 师范大学社会科学学报，3, 94–98．</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Горбунов А. С. Воспитание личности и социальная ответственность средств массовой коммуникации // Гуманитарный вестник Военной академии Ракетных войск стратегического назначения. 2023. № 4 (34). С. 162–166.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gorbunov, A. S. (2023). Personality Education and Social Responsibility of Mass Media. In: Humanitarian Bulletin of the Military Academy of Strategic Rocket Troops, 4 (34), 162–166 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Драгун Е. В., Колесниченко Ю. В. Благородный муж как модель гибридной личности в этикополитическом учении Конфуция // Вестник Тверского государственного университета. Серия: Философия. 2024. № 3 (69). С. 224–234. DOI: 10.26456/vtphilos/2024.3.224.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dragun, E. V. &amp; Kolesnichenko, Yu. V. (2024). The Noble Man as a Model of Hybrid Personality in Confucius’s Ethical and Political Teachings. In: Herald of Tver State University. Series: Philosophy, 3 (69), 224–234. DOI: 10.26456/vtphilos/2024.3.224 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Майкова В. П., Молчан Э. М. Метафизика мировоззренческих универсалий // Актуальные проблемы современной России: психология, педагогика, экономика, управление и право: сборник научных трудов: материалы III Ежегодной Международной научно-практической конференции, Всероссийского круглого стола и Всероссийских научно-практических конференций, Москва, 16 мая – 27 ноября 2024 г. М.: Московский психолого-социальный университет, 2024. С. 2226–2231.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maikova, V. P. &amp; Molchan, E. M. (2024). Metaphysics of Worldview Universals. In: Actual Problems of Modern Russia: Psychology, Pedagogy, Economics, Management and Law: Collection of Scientific Papers: Proceedings of the III Annual International Scientific and Practical Conference, All-Russian Round Table and All-Russian Scientific and Practical conferences, Moscow, May 16 – November 27, 2024. Moscow: Moscow University of Psychology and Social Sciences publ., pp. 2226–2231 (in Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
